Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
896 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
Petitioner Banarsi Patel filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents to free his land of all encumbrances. The Court held that the relief sought amounts to an injunction arising from a pure civil dispute involving factual questions. Accordingly, the Court …
Ankit Kumar filed a petition under Article 226 seeking a fresh passport while a criminal case (NCR No. 60 of 2017 under Sections 323 and 504 IPC) was pending against him. The respondents, the Union of India and others, argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued and that the passport could not …
Aman Murshid filed a writ petition challenging the non-issuance of his passport. The respondents submitted a counter affidavit stating that, following a clear police verification report, passport No. BB497187 was issued to the petitioner on 24 September 2026 and dispatched to his postal address. The …
Petitioner Jayshri Chauhan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate, Mau, to decide a claim/representation filed on 6 July 2026 within a fixed time. The petition argued that the pending representation was being unduly delayed. The respondents, …
M/s Jindal Concrete Prodect filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh State Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) Facilitation Council to decide its pending MSME application under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, …
Petitioner Trilokinath Mishra filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a government authority, to decide his representation dated 25 July 2026. The petitioner alleged undue delay in the decision of his representation. The State's standing counsel …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the reissuance of his passport, which was pending before the Regional Passport Officer. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because of a pending criminal case (case crime no. 0233 of 2026) …
Petitioner Govind Ballabh Gautam filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to return his earnest money deposit of Rs 5,75,000 with 12% interest and costs. He had earlier filed an application/representation on 28 July 2026 which remained pending. The …
Petitioner Deepak Kumar Das filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to pay arrears of rent of Rs. 16,45,000 with interest as per a lease deed dated 18-10-2023. The petition alleged that the respondent had failed to make the payment and …
The petitioner, Azahruddin, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking mandamus to prevent illegal detention and harassment of himself and his family, and to restrain certain respondents from taking coercive action against others. The petitioner had previously submitted a …
The petitioner, a minor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a correction of his date of birth in his Aadhaar card from 07-09-2009 to 07-09-2008. The respondents argued that the correction must follow the procedure laid down in the U.P. Janhit Guarantee Act, 2011, which requires an …
Petitioner Rang Bahadur filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the Executive Officer of Nagar Palika Parishad Mungra Badshahpur, Jaunpur to correct the death date of Shyam Lal from 01‑08‑1984 to 25‑07‑1982 as recorded on 14‑01‑2022. The petitioner …
Petitioner Santosh Kumar Keshari filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to protect his legal title and possession over two land parcels in Prayagraj. The Court examined the nature of the relief and held that it amounted to an …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State to act against alleged illegal encroachment on two plots of land in Etah district. The petition alleged that respondents 6 and 7, with assistance of respondents 3, 4 and 5, had encroached upon the plots. …
The petitioner, Kamaljeet Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to protect his life, liberty and dignity from alleged threats and harassment by certain respondents and their associates. The petition highlighted that the …
The petitioner, Vikram Patel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for a fresh passport. The respondents, the Union of India and others, argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because of a criminal case pending against him …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for a fresh passport. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because of a pending criminal case (IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 147) registered as case …
Petitioner Puran Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to decide his application dated 08.05.2026, which sought protection against police interference in cutting popular and eucalyptus trees on his land in Muzaffarnagar. The …
Petitioner Jokhai and another filed a writ petition challenging a guarantee they had signed for a loan advanced by the Government of India. The petitioners admitted that they had executed the guarantee documents. The Court examined the original records and, noting the admission, declined to grant …
Ashok Chauhan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a court order directing the Regional Passport Officer to dispose of his pending passport application. The respondents argued that the application had been closed because the petitioner failed to respond to a show‑cause notice, and that he …
The petitioner, Kumari Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing Union Bank of India to release her pension arrears of Rs.1,15,641 with interest for the period April to November 2019. She had previously filed an application on 10 July 2026 with the concerned …
Petitioner Ritesh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition alleging trespass by private parties and seeking relief from the State of U.P. The petitioner argued that a suit filed by the private parties had been dismissed and that the State had not acted on his grievance. The State contended that the …
The petitioner, Aparna Singh, sought a water connection for the first‑floor residence, alleging that denial of potable water and electricity was unjust while a property dispute involving his mother‑in‑law’s house was pending in a civil suit. The respondent argued that there was no difficulty in …
Petitioner Smt. Krishna Sharma filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash a notice dated 11‑06‑2026 issued by Respondent No.3 and a mandamus directing Respondents No.3 and No.4 not to impede her peaceful possession of the land. The petitioner had replied to the notice on …
Murabba Devi filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to disburse the full compensation amount under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana, along with a weekly penalty of Rs.2500. The petitioner had already submitted a representation …
Petitioner Abdul Rahim filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide a representation he had submitted on 24-10-2025. The petition alleged that the representation remained pending. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents …
The petitioner, Smt. Mamata Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a government authority, to pay Rs. 5,00,000 as compensation for the accidental death of her husband under the Chief Minister Farmer Accident Welfare Scheme, and to decide a …
Mantu Yadav filed a petition under Article 226 seeking disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued because a criminal case (IPC Section 363) was pending against him. The Court observed that the petitioner must first comply with the …
Petitioner Dharampal Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to protect his life and property and to compel the authorities to decide his application regarding a 1/3 share in a land parcel. The Court observed that the relief sought amounts to an injunction arising out of a …
Shahid Khan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because of a criminal case (IPC §§ 506, 504, 323, 452) pending against him. The Court observed …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State officials to delete their names from the Electoral List of Nagar Palika Parishad, Jaswant Nagar, Etawah, and to register them in the final Electoral List of the Gram Panchayat, Khitaura, Mahewa Development …
The petitioner, Manju Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a public authority, to consider her pending application dated 24-08-2026 within a short, fixed period. The petitioner alleged that the authority had not yet …
Petitioner Nirmla Devi filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a government authority, to consider her pending application dated 24-08-2026 within a short period. The petitioner alleged that the authority had not yet acted on her application. The …
Kavita Traders filed a writ petition against the Panchayat Raj Department and three others. The petition was taken up out of turn after a request by the petitioner's counsel. No representative of the petitioner appeared before the court. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition for want …
The petitioner, Pramod, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending fresh passport application. The respondents, Union of India, informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner in connection with a criminal case (case crime no. 64A of …
The petitioner, Rajnath Ram, filed a writ petition seeking a temporary injunction against private respondents who were allegedly interfering with his right to construct on a demolished structure he claims as his own. The petitioner had already instituted a civil suit on the same matter and argued …
The petitioner, Jagdish, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to consider his representations dated 22 June, 23 June, and 1 July 2026 and to restrain private respondents from forcibly taking possession of his abadi land in collusion …
Petitioner Lalji Nishad filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to decide his representation dated 09-07-2026 and to grant a ferry licence for a water boat on the Tons River in Mau district. The petitioner alleged that the competent …
Petitioner Jabbar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking an interim mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other officials to act on several complaint applications filed in 2025. The petitioner relied on a specific Government Order dated 17 February 2020 to support the relief. The Court …
The petitioner, Saurabh Agrawal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the third respondent, a municipal authority, to consider his representations dated 28 January 2026 and 12 May 2026 for the mutation of his father's name in the Nagar Nigam …
Petitioner Rajendra Nisad filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar to decide his representation dated 24 July 2026 by passing a reasoned order within a time frame fixed by the Court. The Court examined the petition and observed that …
Shahida Bano filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction that the police not harass her or her son, who is named in a criminal case, and that the pending application dated 13 August 2026 be disposed of. The State’s standing counsel submitted that the son was called for investigation, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to correct his date of birth in his Aadhaar card from 05.01.2007 to 01.01.2006. The respondent argued that the correction must follow the procedure prescribed under the U.P. Janhit Guarantee Act, 2011, which requires an …
Petitioner Sonu filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for a fresh passport. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued because a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0563 of 2022) under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC was pending …
The petitioners sought enforcement of a temporary injunction order issued by the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Prayagraj. The High Court observed that a breach of such an injunction can be remedied by filing a miscellaneous application under Order 39 Rule 2‑A of the Code of Civil Procedure, which the …
Petitioner Yogesh Kumar Agrawal filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking re‑issuance of his expired passport, alleging that his criminal conviction and two‑year sentence should not bar the passport as he has already paid the imposed fine and the case is concluded. The respondents argued that …
Petitioner Madhu Gupta filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Kaushambi to decide an application filed on 12 December 2020. The petition alleged undue delay in the adjudication of the application. The learned Standing …
The petition was filed by a minor victim of sexual assault who was approximately 13-16 years old and pregnant at about 29 weeks, seeking a medical termination of pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. The High Court directed the Chief Medical Superintendent to admit the …
Petitioner Shama Parveen filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a certiorari to quash notices issued by Nagar Panchayat, Wazirganj, Budaun demanding payment of electricity dues. The respondents argued that the notices were the only procedural step and that the petitioner …
Petitioner Ravindra Singh Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to decide a representation dated 31 July 2026 concerning the alleged illegal restriction of water flow from the Nali to a pond in …
Petitioners Pramod Kumar Pandey and two others filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh State Medical Faculty, Lucknow to register their Bachelor of Physiotherapy degrees. The petitioners argued that the matter was not res integra, citing a 2018 Lucknow …
Petitioner Kurban Ali filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking issuance of a fresh passport, which was pending with the Regional Passport Officer. The respondents informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because a criminal case (Case Crime No. 275 of 2007) …
The petitioners, Pankaj and another, challenged an objection raised by respondents 4 and 5 to the removal of a tamarind tree that had fallen on the petitioners' land. They argued that the tree was originally standing away from the disputed land, which is already the subject of writ petition 8928 of …
The petitioner, Smt. Sarita Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a notice dated 01‑07‑2026 issued by Respondent No.3, alleging that her reply submitted on 30‑06‑2025 had not been considered. The Standing Counsel for the respondents raised no objection to disposing of the …
The petitioner, Umeshankar Shukla, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking protection of his possession rights under a decree dated 21 May 2025 in Original Suit No. 122 of 2026. The High Court examined whether the petitioner could obtain relief through a writ or should …
Shiv Kumar Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State Bank of India to de‑freeze his account (No. 20239675247) which had been frozen following a complaint from an investigating agency about doubtful transactions. The bank contended that the freeze was …
The petitioner, Mohammad Munna, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking re‑issuance of his passport for a ten‑year period, relying on a trial court order that gave a no‑objection but did not specify a duration. The Regional Passport Officer had instead issued a passport valid for only one …
The petitioner, Helal Ahmad, challenged the Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta's proceeding with a complaint concerning the execution of a sale deed that is also the subject of a pending civil suit (O.S. No.1614 of 2024). The petitioner argued that under Section 8(1)(b) of the Lokayukta Act, 1975, the …
Shabnam Parveen filed a writ petition challenging the Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta's jurisdiction to entertain a complaint concerning the execution of a sale deed, which is also the subject of a pending civil suit (O.S. No.1614 of 2024) filed by the same complainant. The petitioner argued that under …
The petitioner, claiming ownership of a plot in Village Kaila, Ghaziabad, challenged a demolition notice issued by the Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam under Article 226 of the Constitution. He had filed a reply to the notice on 21‑08‑2026, which remained unconsidered. The respondents, representing the …
Petitioner Sunny Jaiswal filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued because a criminal case (case crime no. 54 of 2025 under Section 223 IPC) was pending against him. The Court held …
Petitioner Afzal Ahmad challenged the Regional Passport Officer's closure of his passport re‑issuance file on the ground that he had not obtained a no‑objection certificate from the trial court where he faces a criminal case. The petitioner, who is residing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, argued that the …
The petitioner, Pushpa Devi, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order rejecting her claim for financial assistance under the Mukhya Mantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana, 2020, on the ground that her deceased husband was a government employee and thus not a "farmer". She submitted evidence …
The petitioner, Sweta Rana, sought relief concerning indecent photographs allegedly posted online and related chat material. The Court had previously ordered the masking of questionable material on 19.08.2026. Respondent No.2, Amit Rawat, appeared in person and affirmed that the cellphone containing …
Petitioner Prashant Kumar Gupta filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued because a criminal case (Case Crime No. 1215 of 2028 under IPC sections 323, 504, 506) was pending against …
Petitioner Brij Mohan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to UIDAI and its regional office to correct his name from 'Ramvriksh' to 'Brij Mohan' in his Aadhaar record. The respondents contended that the petitioner must first obtain a Gazette notification of the name change as …
Petitioner Mohammad Irfan, residing in Saudi Arabia with an expired passport, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India and others to issue a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC). The respondents argued that because his passport had expired, Irfan must …
The petitioners, senior residents who have completed one year of service under a government bond, applied for No Objection Certificates (NOC) to take up Assistant Professor posts after selection. The State Government refused to grant the NOC, citing its own order dated 27.07.2026, which the …
The petitioners, Jagannath and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others not to disturb their peaceful possession of a 0.1140 hectare plot of land in Jaunpur. The High Court examined the petition and observed that the relief sought …
Petitioner Chhedi Chauhan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for re‑issuance of a passport. The respondents, including the Union of India, issued a show‑cause notice citing a criminal case (Case Crime No. 1193 of 2013) under Section 3(1) of the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the Sub Registrar's refusal to register a sale deed that had been executed earlier in his favour but later concealed when the vendor executed a subsequent sale deed in favour of a third party, which was registered on 29 December …
Petitioner Taqdeer Ali filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the issuance of his pending passport application. The respondents informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because of a criminal case pending against him under Sections 354, 506 and 323 of the …
Petitioner Saloni filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the Union of India to correct her name in the Aadhaar database from ‘Sanoli’ to ‘Saloni’. The respondent argued that a mere representation is insufficient and that, under the Janhit Guarantee Act, 2011, the petitioner …
Petitioner Sadanand Gupta filed a writ petition alleging that the State of U.P. and four others interfered with his peaceful possession and restrained him from constructing on land for which he holds a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction. The petitioner claimed non‑compliance with the …
Petitioner Sane Ali and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a certiorari to quash the orders of the Registrar of Marriages under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, which refused to solemnise and register their marriage. The Registrar declined on the ground that …
Neeraj Garg filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing Indian Overseas Bank to de‑freeze his account (No. 153202000001017) after it was frozen on a complaint from an investigating agency about doubtful transactions. The bank argued that the freeze was justified pending …
Petitioner Varis filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the defreezing of his bank account (No. 41386040652) which had been frozen following a complaint to an investigating agency about suspicious transactions. The respondent bank argued that the freeze was justified pending investigation. …
The petitioner, Ram Milan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a court direction for a land measurement exercise, alleging trespass and interference by respondents No.4 and No.5. He already has a civil suit (O.S. No.603 of 2019) concerning the same land and had earlier obtained a …
Petitioner Sahabuddin filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for a fresh passport. The respondents informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 163 of 2020) under Sections 3 and 4 of …
Petitioner Nirdesh Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a passport valid for ten years as prescribed under the Passports Act, 1967. Respondents argued that, because the petitioner is involved in a criminal case, only a one‑year passport may be issued, subject to a No Objection …
Petitioner Smt. Nayanpati, through counsel Parv Agarwal, filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 30824 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner later expressed a desire not to pursue the petition and requested its withdrawal. The court considered the request and, without examining any …
The petitioner was denied a fresh passport on the ground that a criminal case (Case Crime No. 753 of 2009) was pending, although the investigating officer had submitted a final/closure report which the magistrate had accepted on 27‑07‑2010 and no charge sheet was filed. The petitioner argued that, …
The petitioner, Faiyaz Husain, challenged an order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridpur, Bareilly, which stayed a summoning order in Criminal Case No.1523 of 2025 but failed to issue a No Objection Certificate (NOC) required for obtaining a passport and travelling abroad. The Court examined …
The petitioner, Sanjay Bharti, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to consider and decide his representations dated 22.01.2026 and 04.06.2026 with a reasoned order. The respondents submitted instructions indicating that the representation …
The petitioners purchased a property from the original owner, Hari Singh Kushwaha, after a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction was passed against Om Prakash in 2021. Om Prakash appealed the decree, and while his second appeal was pending, the court ordered that no third‑party rights could be …
Petitioner Ravindra Rai filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents argued that the petitioner had been served a show‑cause notice because of several criminal cases pending against him under the Indian Penal Code, the Scheduled Castes …
Petitioner Mohammad Esa filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for a fresh passport. The respondents informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0531 of 2023) under Sections 3 and 25 …
The petitioner, Aman Chauhan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for a fresh passport. The respondents, including the Union of India, issued a show‑cause notice because a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0319 of 2025) is pending against the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking re‑issuance of his passport with the date of birth corrected to match his High School Certificate. He alleged that the passport issued in 2014 contained an incorrect date of birth and that his subsequent application for correction was …
Petitioner Rahul Yadav, who had been issued a passport valid for one year due to his involvement in a criminal case, sought a ten‑year passport as prescribed under the Passport Act, 1967. The trial court had earlier granted a No Objection Certificate (NOC) with a rider limiting the passport to a …
The petitioner, Amarjeet, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking disposal of a pending reply dated 08.08.2026 to a notice issued on 05.08.2026. The petitioner had also applied for the supply of certain documents to enable an effective reply. The Court observed that the …
The petitioners, a school management committee, filed a writ petition alleging that the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents were interfering with the peaceful functioning of their institution located on land claimed to belong to the Narcotics Department, Government of India. The petitioners …
Petitioners, a group of six individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh State Medical Faculty, Lucknow to register their Bachelor of Physiotherapy degrees. The petitioners argued that the matter was not res integra because …
Petitioner Basant filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondents, particularly respondents 2 and 3, to provide police protection at his house and to evict respondents 5 and 6 who were alleged to have taken illegal possession of his property. The petition also …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar, filed Writ No. 35526 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner expressed a desire not to pursue the petition and requested its withdrawal. The standing counsel for the State of U.P. raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting …
Petitioner Smt Reena Patel filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to decide a representation dated 25‑08‑2026 within a time frame fixed by the Court. The Court examined whether such a direction could be granted as a writ remedy. …
Petitioner Dushyant Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Reserve Bank of India and Canara Bank to de‑freeze his bank account (No. 110238672813) which had been frozen on a complaint from an investigating agency alleging doubtful transactions. The respondent …
Satkar Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the renewal of his passport, which was pending before the Regional Passport Officer. He is a bail‑granted accused in NCR No. 0097 of 2020 under Sections 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court’s …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Kanpur Police Commissioner to enforce a temporary injunction granted in his civil suit, alleging that the respondent had dispossessed him despite the injunction. The court noted that the temporary injunction …
The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the re‑issuance of his passport, which was pending before the Regional Passport Officer. The respondents contended that a show‑cause notice had been issued because a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0034 of 2024) under …
Petitioner Rajesh Yadav filed a writ petition challenging an alleged illegal encroachment on public land identified as Garha (Arazi No. 19, 0.2060 hectare). The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and six others, contested the claim. The Court examined whether the writ jurisdiction was the …
The petitioner, Meera Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Nagar Ayukta of Gorakhpur to issue a death certificate for her missing husband, who had been absent since August 2015. The petitioner argued that a civil death had occurred after seven years of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to dismantle an abandoned handpipe obstructing access to his bhumidhari land, relying on a spot inspection report. He also highlighted a pending application dated 22 July 2026 that had not been …
The petitioner, Gaya Shankar Pandey, sought relief to release money held by a financial institution, arguing that the appropriate mode was to make a representation under Section 7 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, 2019. The petitioner had previously filed an application before the …
Santosh Kumar filed a petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because of a criminal case (crime no. 286 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of …
Petitioner Dilip Rai filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing certain state respondents to take preventive legal action against private respondents under the Anti‑Bhumafiya guidelines. The Court examined whether such a direction amounted to an injunction arising from a …
Petitioner Akhand Pratap Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the defreezing of his SBI and HDFC bank accounts, alleging that they were frozen without prior intimation. The respondents, the Reserve Bank of India and the two banks, contended that the freeze was justified on the basis …
Sandhya Sanni Sharma filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 36411 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh one. The standing counsel …
Chandrawati Devi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and another respondent. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and to be allowed to file a fresh one. The standing counsel for the respondents raised no …
Avilpan Nesha filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and another respondent. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and to be allowed to file a fresh one. The standing counsel for the respondents raised no …
Koshila Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 36354 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and another respondent. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh one. The standing counsel for the …
Petitioner Kulli Devi filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing forest authorities not to dispossess her 1.2530 hectare forest land (Gata No. 41) pending the disposal of her petition under Sections 9 and 11 of the Indian Forest Act before the Forest Settlement Officer. The …
Petitioner Ravi Shankar Pandey filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the defreezing of his bank account No. 3207101003530, which had been frozen following a complaint to an investigating agency alleging doubtful transactions. The respondent bank contended that the freeze was justified on …
Petitioner Arun Nishad filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to release Rs. 4 lakh as natural disaster relief under the Disaster Management Act, 2005. The petitioner had already submitted a representation to Respondent No.3 on …
Petitioner Angad, employed in Saudi Arabia, approached the Allahabad High Court under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the Union of India to re‑issue his expired passport. The respondents argued that, under Section 4(2) of the Passport Act, 1967, the petitioner must first obtain an …
Petitioner Nirbhay Kumar Rai filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents, including the Union of India, informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because of a criminal case (crime no. 194 of …
Petitioners Hitesh Kumar and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 29‑08‑2025 (Crime No. 50 of 2025) alleging offences under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 64 and 82 of the Indian Penal Code, the Dowry Prohibition Act and other statutes, and also …
Petitioner Siddheshwar Construction Co. filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an auction sale notice dated 22 April 2026, arguing that the auction was to be held on the same day and no presiding officer was available at the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) Allahabad to …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged in Crime No.103 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State's Additional …
The petitioners, Shahid alias Sadiq and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (chargesheet no. A-383/24) filed in Crime No.0465 of 2024 under several sections of the BNS. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 226 seeking a direction to the respondent bank to defreeze two of their accounts that had been frozen during a police investigation related to a criminal complaint against one of them. The petitioners argued that no court order of attachment existed and …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the filing of a charge sheet (chargesheet no. A-383/24) in Crime No.0465 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under several sections of the B.N.S. Act. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, though the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ No. 38399 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to pursue the petition. The court noted the absence of any representation and consequently dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (WRIT-C No. 40417 of 2025) against Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. The Court observed that the petition was not being prosecuted. Consequently, the petition was dismissed …
The petitioner, Sanjay Mishra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court, noting the petition was no longer viable, consigned the petition to …
The petitioners, creditors of a leaseholder (respondent No.15) of the Ghaziabad Development Authority, challenged coercive recovery actions by revenue authorities, including illegal detention and forced signing of cheques. During the pendency of the writ petition, insolvency proceedings were …
Petitioner Mahendra Singh and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Mohit Kumar Singh, submitted an application to withdraw the petition, stating that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the matter. The respondents' …
The petitioners, Satendra Singh and three others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed that they no longer wished to pursue the petition. The respondents' counsel raised no objection to this request. The court considered the …
Petitioners filed Writ No. 45001 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioners, through counsel Mohit Kumar Singh, filed an application to withdraw the petition, stating they no longer wish to pursue it. The respondents' counsel raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after …
The petitioners, three residents of East Champaran, were arrested in connection with a case alleging participation in an unlawful assembly that assaulted an informant, caused injuries, and involved theft of valuables. They claimed innocence, arguing that the incident involved a case and counter‑case …
The petitioners sought bail in a criminal case (P.S. Case No.593 of 2025) where they were accused of assault, causing injuries, and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They claimed innocence, alleging a case and counter‑case between agnate families and that the injuries were simple. …
The petitioner, Faguni Sahani (Amit Kumar), sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, alleging his involvement in the storage and sale of illegal liquor. The prosecution’s case was based on secret information …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a cyber‑crime FIR (Case No.14 of 2026) alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused Singh Gulshan Kumar, demanded Rs.2,50,000 …
The petitioner, Waris, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Palasi Police Station Case No.479 of 2025, where he was implicated in alleged theft of a motorcycle under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Police acted on a secret tip, identified Waris fleeing the …
The petitioner, Ghanshyam Mandal, was facing an application for the recovery of arms allegedly in his constructive possession. He contended that no such recovery had been made and, relying on his antecedent circumstances, sought permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the …
The petitioners, five members of the Yadav family, were implicated in a FIR alleging assault, robbery, and other offences arising from a family dispute, with charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including non‑bailable Section 110. They claimed innocence, stating the …
Manoj Pandey filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar and several officials. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner claimed that his grievances had been fully redressed. He consequently moved the court to withdraw the writ …
The petitioners sought bail in a criminal case (P.S. Case No.593 of 2025) where they were accused of assault, causing injuries, and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They claimed innocence, alleging a case and counter‑case between agnate families and that the injuries were simple. …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Singh, sought bail in a criminal case (PS Case No.598 of 2025) alleging assault and conspiracy to seize land, where the FIR named him among 40-50 accused but did not allege any specific act by him. He claimed innocence, arguing that the only specific allegations were …
Sudhir Rai applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged assault, injury, and theft linked to a long‑standing land dispute. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, assaulted the informant’s husband with a bamboo lathi, caused injuries, and stole jewellery. …
Petitioner Rajmangal Prasad filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Bihar and its officials to grant him a handgun license under the Arms Act. He had already submitted an application in the prescribed format to the District Magistrate, Gaya on 19 May 2023, but no decision had been …
The petitioner Jamil Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a First Information Report and subsequent charge sheet in Crime No. 78 of 2023, which alleged offences under Section 366 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. No …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 121 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 363, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 198 of 2022, which alleged their involvement under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 504, 506 and 406 of the erstwhile IPC. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State's …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 272/2022) in Crime No. 118 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
Smt. Meena filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged in Crime No. 37 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The …
The petitioners, Smt. Aarti Verma and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged in Crime No. 941 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 406 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No. 663 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a refund of money he had deposited with the High Court's Mediation and Conciliation Centre after the opposite parties failed to appear, causing mediation to fail. The petitioner argued that, since the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No. 30 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 323, 494, 498A, 504, 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. No …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 41 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 308, 323 and 504 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the filing of a charge sheet (CS 383/2023) in Crime No. 122 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 504 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent filing of a charge sheet (CS 262/2022) in Crime No. 267 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 377, 307, 504, 506 of the erstwhile IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 83 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police …
The petitioners, Brijesh and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 97 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 498A and DP Act sections 3 and 4. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No. 182 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 120B, 420, 406, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 172/2023) filed in Crime No. 76 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. No …
The petitioners, Ankit Kumar and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the filing of a charge sheet (CS 182/2023) in Crime No. 138 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet in Crime No. 170 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence (Protection) Act. No petitioner counsel appeared …
The petitioners challenged the filing of a First Information Report and subsequent charge sheet in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. They argued that the counter‑affidavit had not been filed and sought relief from the High Court. The police, …
The petitioners Arman and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 79 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376, 377, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. No petitioner …
The petition, filed by Sunil Verma (a minor), sought to challenge the First Information Report (FIR) relating to Crime No. 133 of 2023, which alleged offences under Section 376 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State's Additional …
The petitioner, Ajay Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No.69 of 2023, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act. The petition sought judicial intervention to quash the FIR/charge sheet. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR under Section 380 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 79 of 2023. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 170/2023) in Crime No. 138 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376(2)(m), 352, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State’s …
The petitioners, Nivas Ali and another, filed a writ petition (C No. 34330 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The matter was listed under the "Oldest Pending Cases" priority hearing, but the petitioners failed to appear even after a revised call. The State respondents, …
The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari under Article 226 to quash a notice dated 26‑10‑2023 issued by a private bank under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The respondents argued that the High Court lacks jurisdiction to interfere in such matters, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari under Article 226 to quash an order dated 15.04.2026 passed by the District Magistrate, Bijnor, invoking Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act in a debt recovery case. The respondents argued that the High Court should not interfere with actions of a private bank …
The petitioner, owner of 0.018 hectare of plot No. 470 in Bhadohi district, filed a petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus to restrain the Public Works Department (PWD) from interfering with his possession. The State had already compensated the petitioner for a larger portion (0.071 …
The petitioner, Vivek Kumar Tiwari, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Bihar and its officials to grant him an arms licence. He had submitted an application in the prescribed format to the Siwan District Magistrate eight years earlier, but no decision had been taken. The …
Petitioners Shambhu Sharan Prasad and Dinesh Ram, both assistant teachers, filed a writ petition seeking direction to grant them the matric trained pay scale after completing three years of regular service, alleging that the respondents failed to send them for in‑service training as mandated by a …
The petitioner, a school teacher appointed at Uchcha Madhyamik Vidyalaya Madhopur, filed a writ petition seeking transfer to a school nearer his residence, citing a transfer policy (Memo No. 1729 dated 07‑10‑2024) that permits transfers on special circumstances. He argued that his widowed mother …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar Mishra, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Bihar and its officials to grant him an arms licence. He had already submitted an application in the prescribed format to the District Magistrate, Siwan, on 21‑02‑2024, but no decision had been taken. The …
The petitioner, Mohd. Saleem, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the release of his hypothecated vehicle seized by the respondent bank for default on loan EMIs. The bank argued that seizure was lawful due to the default. The petitioner offered to pay a lump sum of Rs 15,00,000 within 30 …
The petitioner, Trisha Saxena, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash a notice dated 30.02.2026 issued by an Advocate Commissioner that led to possession of her property by a bank. She argued that only the bank, not the Advocate Commissioner, was authorized to issue such notice. …
The petitioner, Mrityunjay Tiwari, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 11579 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel was absent while the respondents’ counsel and the standing counsel were present. The court noted the non‑appearance of the petitioner’s …
A public interest litigation was filed by Vijay Bharadwaj and nine others against the State of Uttar Pradesh and six other respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the State respondents and one respondent were represented. The Court dismissed the writ petition on the …
Petitioner Rajneesh Pathak filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to decide a representation filed on 5 January 2026 within a stipulated period. The respondent's standing counsel did not object to the petition, provided the representation is decided in a …
Petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction for the State respondents to deliver possession of secured assets in favor of the secured creditor. They relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in C. Bright v. District Collector, contending that a nodal officer and police …
The petitioner, a borrower, challenged an order of a financial institution under the SARFAESI Act, seeking time to clear outstanding dues of Rs. 3,24,882.46. The bank agreed to accept an initial payment of Rs. 1.5 lakh by 6 June 2026 and the balance in two bimonthly installments, provided the …
Sharada Devi filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking compensation ordered under Section 5(1) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The petitioner alleged that despite an order dated 26 July 2024, no compensation had been paid by the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently sought to withdraw it. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, and the respondents’ counsel raised no objection. The court, noting the mutual consent and lack of any pending …
Petitioner Rajendra Prasad Goel filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Collector/District Magistrate of Gautam Buddh Nagar to enforce a recovery certificate dated 27‑01‑2026 issued by the Secretary of the U.P. Real Estate Authority under Section 40 of the U.P. Real …
Petitioner Pawananjay Kumar Jain filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the Collector/District Magistrate of Gautam Buddh Nagar to enforce a recovery certificate dated 27 November 2025 issued by the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Authority (RERA) under …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a certiorari to quash an auction notice dated 08.06.2022 issued by Aadhar Housing Finance Ltd. under the SARFAESI Act. The respondents argued that the High Court lacks jurisdiction to interfere in the enforcement …
Petitioner Amrendra Kumar Jaiswal filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing Union Bank of India to return possession of secured assets, claiming he had repaid all dues. The bank contended that the petitioner had already filed a petition under Section 17 of the SARFAESI …
HDFC Bank Ltd. filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State respondent (No.3) to pass an order in SARFAESI proceedings (Case No. 5136/2021) and to hand over physical possession of the secured asset. The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s earlier decision in …
The petitioner, Siddarth Raja Parmar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from the police after the police had submitted a charge-sheet in the magistrate's court. The petitioner argued that the first information report (FIR) should be considered at this stage. The High …
The petitioners, Sushma Keshari and two others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Sitaram Yadav, informed the court that the petition had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The standing counsel for the State of U.P., Rupesh Tiwari, raised no objection. …
The petitioner, Parshuram Ishwar, sought a compassionate appointment as a clerk after his father, a Zila Parishad teacher, died in service in 2017. He filed an application in 2018 and a fresh one in 2025, but the District Education Officer and District Programme Officer failed to act despite a memo …
The petitioner, Binod Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Circle Officer, Triveniganj, to conclude an encroachment case (No. 02/2019‑20) concerning a 60‑foot strip of public land (Gairmajarua Aam) that had been occupied and was obstructing a road. The Court noted procedural …
The petitioners, a group of individuals, filed a writ petition before the Patna High Court seeking removal of alleged encroachments on two parcels of public land (Khata No. 84, Plot No. 886 and Plot No. 860) in Simra, Aurangabad district. They alleged that despite notices issued in 2024, the …
The petitioners, Ashok Kumar and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No.787 of 2022, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
Petitioners Jagdish Chandra Saini and two others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, while counsel for the respondents were present. The court noted that the matter, listed in 2015, was an old pending case and …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 25 of 2023, which involved offences under various sections of the erstwhile IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act, and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. No petitioner appeared before …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 89 of 2023 under Section 306 of the erstwhile IPC, alleging their involvement. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had already …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 320/2023) in Crime No.197 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Delhi Police Act. No petitioner counsel …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR under Section 363 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 26 of 2023, alleging their involvement. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, though the State's Additional Government …
The petitioners sought a writ to quash the First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No. 130 of 2022, which alleged offences under various sections of the erstwhile IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No.125 of 2023, alleging offences under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State’s …
