Created by Fuzzy Cloud

AJIT KUMAR

1003 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

Parshuram IshwarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Parshuram Ishwar, sought a compassionate appointment as a clerk after his father, a Zila Parishad teacher, died in service in 2017. He filed an application in 2018 and a fresh one in 2025, but the District Education Officer and District Programme Officer failed to act despite a memo …

Binod Kumar @ Binod Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Binod Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Circle Officer, Triveniganj, to conclude an encroachment case (No. 02/2019‑20) concerning a 60‑foot strip of public land (Gairmajarua Aam) that had been occupied and was obstructing a road. The Court noted procedural …

Sudhir MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of individuals, filed a writ petition before the Patna High Court seeking removal of alleged encroachments on two parcels of public land (Khata No. 84, Plot No. 886 and Plot No. 860) in Simra, Aurangabad district. They alleged that despite notices issued in 2024, the …

ASHOK KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ashok Kumar and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No.787 of 2022, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …

JAGDISH CHANDRA SAINI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Jagdish Chandra Saini and two others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, while counsel for the respondents were present. The court noted that the matter, listed in 2015, was an old pending case and …

SYED TASVIR HAIDER AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 25 of 2023, which involved offences under various sections of the erstwhile IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act, and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. No petitioner appeared before …

NATTHI SINGH @ BHOLA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 89 of 2023 under Section 306 of the erstwhile IPC, alleging their involvement. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had already …

MARUF HUSAIN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 320/2023) in Crime No.197 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Delhi Police Act. No petitioner counsel …

HASIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR under Section 363 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 26 of 2023, alleging their involvement. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, though the State's Additional Government …

ASHISH TRIVEDI AND 3 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ to quash the First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No. 130 of 2022, which alleged offences under various sections of the erstwhile IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was …

ANIL KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No.125 of 2023, alleging offences under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State’s …

SABIR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No.63 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the erstwhile IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on …

RISHABH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rishabh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet in Crime No. 17 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …

GAURAV UPPAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and seeking quashing of the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 50 of 2023 under Sections 420 and 406 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the learned Additional Government …

KAPIL SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Kapil Sharma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 318/2023) in Crime No.66 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before …

VISHESH SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought to challenge the First Information Report (FIR) and the subsequent charge sheet filed in a criminal case under Sections 498-A, 323, 406, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, though the State’s …

KAVITA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a First Information Report and subsequent charge sheet (A-120/2023) in Crime No.101 of 2023 under Section 366 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's …

TAHIR HUSAIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR under Section 420 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No.124 of 2023. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had …

AMAN NIGANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Aman Nigan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 212/2023) in Crime No.91 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 504, 506, 354, 354(Gh), 354(Gha) of the erstwhile IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. No …

RAJESH GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rajesh Gupta and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the FIR and seeking to question the charge sheet filed in a criminal case under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The High Court noted that the charge sheet (No. A‑175/2023) had …

BHAGWAN DAS PALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No.43 of 2022 under Sections 3 and 5 of the Prevention of Damages of Public Property Act, 1984. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The court …

RAJESH PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajesh Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No. 281 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while the …

UPENDRA GOND @ UPENDRA KUMAR GOND AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered under Section 363 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 217 of 2021. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had already …

PREETI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No.106 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 363 and 504 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s …

ANKISH TRIPATHI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ankish Tripathi and others filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the FIR in Crime No. 0024 of 2025, alleging that no charge sheet had been filed. The court examined the police’s office report dated 27 April 2026, which indicated that a charge sheet (CS‑145/25) had indeed …

MEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Meer Singh, challenged a final assessment order dated 9 May 2025 that imposed liability for alleged theft of electricity. He had earlier filed a reply on 16 January 2025 contesting the assessment, but the assessing authority considered only the fact that the connection was domestic …

BADAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Badan Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the development authority to pay compensation of Rs.9,000 per square meter for acquired land. The respondent, represented by counsel, submitted that the compensation award had already been finalized and paid, and that any …

A.U. SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.versusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

A.U. Small Finance Bank Ltd. filed a review petition challenging the High Court's order dated 3 April 2026, which had directed the prescribed authority merely to dispose of a Section 14 application under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The bank argued that the Section 14 application had already been …

AALHA CHAURASIYA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners, claiming ownership of Plot No. 401 Minjumla, filed a writ under Article 226 challenging a SARFAESI Act Section 14 order and a subsequent letter issued by the respondent bank. The bank contended that the property belonged to the borrower based on a will and revenue records showing …

SHAHRUKHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Shahrukh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing a private bank (respondent no.3) to open the seal on his house. The bank contended that the High Court cannot interfere with actions taken under the SARFAESI Act, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in S. Shobha …

SANJAY UPRETIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Sanjay Upreti filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Collector/District Magistrate of Gautam Budh Nagar to execute a Recovery Certificate issued by RERA on 27 July 2024 for a sum of Rs.19,70,506.02 with interest. The respondents, including RERA and the …

M/S FAMOUS ELECTRONIC AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners M/s Famous Electronic and others filed Writ Petition No. 16625 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief related to an auction. Respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petition was a second filing on the same cause, the earlier petition (Writ C No. 28347 of 2024) …

TATA HOUSING FINANCE LTD.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Tata Housing Finance Ltd. filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. (respondent No.3) to pass an order and hand over physical possession of a secured asset in a SARFAESI Act case (Case No. 5084 of 2025). The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s earlier …

AMIT KUMAR GUPTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Amit Kumar Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondent bank to allow him to deposit the balance loan amount in easy installments as fixed by the court. The respondents, including the Union of India, contended that the …

ASHWANI KUMAR KAMBOJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Ashwani Kumar Kamboj filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash a sale notice dated 20.03.2026 issued by a private finance company. The respondents contended that the High Court lacks jurisdiction to interfere with actions taken under the SARFAESI Act, relying …

BIJENDRA PRATAP TIWARI VIJAYANANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 42325 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition and sought liberty to file a fresh petition if needed. The respondent’s standing counsel raised no objection to the …

BIJENDRA PRATAP TIWARI VIJAYANANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bijendra Pratap Tiwari, filed Writ No. 42330 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition and sought liberty to file a fresh petition if required. The respondent’s standing counsel raised no …

Kumar Bijendra PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Kumar Bijendra Prasad filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, neither on the current date nor on the previous hearing. The respondents, represented by Mr. Md. Irshad Ali (A.C. to the Secretary) and Dr. Anand Kumar (advocate …

Santosh Kumar MishraversusBank of India

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar Mishra, a retired Air Force sergeant, received his pension through a Bank of India account. The bank froze Rs. 4,97,817 in his account in 2010 and later recovered Rs. 3,79,403, alleging excess pension payments due to miscalculations. The petitioner sought a waiver of recovery, release …

Sanjay Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking payment of death‑cum‑retirement benefits, ACP gratuity and arrears due to his father, a retired Panchayat Sachiv who died in 2018. He claimed that despite filing a representation, the authorities had not settled the dues. The State …

Lakshmeshwar TiwaryversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lakshmeshwar Tiwary filed a petition before the Patna High Court seeking permission to pursue an appropriate legal remedy after his representation for 10% interest and compensation was rejected by the State authorities. The petitioner argued that the rejection warranted further legal action. The …

Kamal Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Kamal Kumar Sharma filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Bihar and its officials. While the petition was pending, the petitioner informed the court that his grievance had been redressed and he wished to withdraw the writ. The petitioner’s …

Amar Kant ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Amar Kant Chaudhary filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials of the Department of Education and the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner claimed that his grievance had been satisfactorily …

DASHRATH YADAV @ DASHRATH KUMAR YADAVversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

Dashrath Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging embezzlement of Rs 8,17,555 from group loan installments. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, failed to deposit the money with SSFL Company, while the petitioner claimed innocence and that the amount …

Rajesh Kumar Gupta @ Munna GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Munna Gupta, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.11 of 2025 alleging manufacturing of duplicate Ashok Leyland parts, offences under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 63 and 65 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The prosecution’s case was based …

Umesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Umesh Singh and Pramila Devi, the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case (Sangrampur P.S. Case No.434 of 2025) filed under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s complaint, based on …

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Das @ Soldan DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Parasbigha P.S. Case No. 17/2023) involving alleged assault under IPC sections 341, 323, 308, 504, 506 read with 34. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, attacked an informant with weapons, …

Devnath SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners—Devnath Sahni, Krishna Devi, Soni Kumari and Nandani Kumari—filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 15.05.2025 (Mahua P.S. Case No. 558/2025) alleging they killed an informant's daughter over a dowry demand. The prosecution alleged offences …

Mithlesh Kumar @ Mithilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR alleging assault with a knife under Sections 126(2), 118(1), 74 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner attacked a woman near Sipara talab, causing injuries to her neck, …

Ranjeet PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three residents of Karsani village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Rajoun P.S. Case No.395 of 2022) involving alleged assault, attempt to murder, robbery and other offences under the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, led by …

Rajeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary,

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a BPSC TRE-2 school teacher, filed a writ petition seeking a transfer under the Bihar Education Department's transfer policy (Memo No. 1729 dated 07.10.2024) citing special circumstances, namely the distance of his posting (approximately 70 km) from his home and his family …

Rajeev Ranjan @ Rajiv RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a Block Teacher in Rohtas, was convicted under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code in 2017 and sentenced to imprisonment, but was acquitted on appeal in April 2025. During his judicial custody from May 2017 to October 2025, the respondent education authorities treated the …

Pushkar Kumar ArunversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a headmaster, filed a writ petition seeking transfer from his present school to a nearer school to care for his 86‑year‑old mother who requires regular medical attention. He had previously submitted an application for transfer on 14‑Oct‑2024 to the District Education Officer, citing …

Anil ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

A group of nine Prakhand Teachers employed by the Bihar Department of Education since 3 August 2015 filed a writ petition alleging non‑payment of their salaries. Their appointments were under challenge by unsuccessful candidates, and a District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority order denied …

Ashok Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Singh, applied in 2006 for an arms licence (cases 516/2006 and 517/2006). The District Magistrate, Buxar, rejected the application on 28‑Oct‑2021 on the ground that a training certificate under Rule 10 of the Arms Rules, 2016 was required, a requirement that was …

Awadhesh SinghversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

DISPOSED

Awadhesh Singh, a retired assistant of S.B.A.N. College, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his claim for absorption as a non‑teaching employee of Magadh University and for payment of salary arrears. He sought certiorari to quash the rejection order and mandamus directing the …

Basim HusainversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Basim Husain filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging an order of the State Election Commission dated 19-12-2025. The petitioner argued that his grievances had already been redressed by that order. The court examined the record, noted that the order was marked as ‘X’ and …

Sharda Ranjan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

A group of seven assistant teachers filed a writ petition seeking direction that they be placed on the Matric Trained Teachers pay‑scale with effect from the date they completed three years of service, arguing that similarly situated teachers had been granted the same benefit following the High …

Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of 57 teachers, sought a writ of mandamus directing the Bihar Education Department to grant them the grade‑pay and related monetary benefits of trained teachers, claiming entitlement from the date they completed their Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed.) in 2017‑18. …

Shabana KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a headmistress in the Bihar Education Department, filed a writ seeking transfer to a school nearer her residence due to a knee ailment, hypertension and thyroid problems, and because she is nearing retirement. She had previously served as an assistant teacher and was promoted in …

Smt. Pushpa DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Smt. Pushpa Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Programme Officer (Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan) to issue a completion certificate for school construction work and to restrain coercive action against her after bail had been granted. She contended that the …

RAJKUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ to challenge the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 285 of 2025, alleging their involvement based on the FIR under Section 108 BNS. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The police had already …

SMT. MANJUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Manju, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 285 of 2025 under Section 108 BNS. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that …

SMT. MADHU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Madhu and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 285 of 2025 under Section 108 BNS. No petitioner appeared before the court; only the Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court …

Md. AkbarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Md. Akbar and Md. Saddam, were granted anticipatory bail on 18‑12‑2025 in connection with PS case No. 192 of 2025, with a condition to surrender before the lower court within four weeks. They filed a modification application seeking an extension of the surrender period, citing …

Kiran DeviversusThat State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kiran Devi, the widow of the late Madho Jee Singh who was employed as a teacher under the Singheshwari Sanskrit Uchh Vidyalaya, filed a writ petition seeking payment of the difference between the 6th and 7th pay‑scale amounts amounting to Rs 5,34,170 with interest. She relied on a letter dated …

Pratap KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, son of a deceased Class IV employee of Munger Municipal Corporation, filed a writ seeking payment of retirement dues, including the difference under the 7th Pay Revision from April 2017 to March 2020, arrears of family pension up to June 2024, and any other lawful dues. He alleged …

Wasi AkhtarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a large group of teachers who completed the Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed.) in 2017-18, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State of Bihar to grant them grade pay and related monetary benefits from the date of completion of their training. They relied on earlier …

Savita KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Savita Kumari, an EWS (Female) candidate, applied online for the BPSC School Teacher Recruitment 2023 and scored 47 marks, one point below the cut‑off of 48 marks for her category. She filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the authorities consider her for appointment as a …

Shivanand JhaversusThe State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary,

DISPOSED

Shivanand Jha, a former employee, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Bihar and its officials to pay his gratuity for continuous service from 18 July 2013 to 9 April 2025 under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (now Sec. 53 of the Social Security Code, 2020) with interest …

Ram Pukar RaiversusThe State of Bihar, through the Additional Chief Secretary,

DISPOSED

Ram Pukar Rai filed a writ petition seeking payment of up-to‑date interest on a General Provident Fund (GPF) amount that was delayed for about 17 years, and specifically asked for 18% compound interest. The petitioner contended that while his pension and related benefits had been settled, the …

Rajendra Prasad RamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, a retired Technical Advisor, was served a show‑cause notice for alleged misconduct dating back to 2009 and subsequently had a 10% deduction imposed on his monthly pension for three years under Rule 139 of the Bihar Pension Rules, 1950. He contended that no formal departmental enquiry …

Gango Yadav @ Ganga YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, Gango Yadav and family members, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking relief in a criminal miscellaneous case. After the police completed their investigation and submitted the final report, the petitioners approached the court to withdraw the application, stating …

Pappu Yadav alias Karan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Yadav alias Karan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered illegal firearms and cartridges from a house where he was alleged to have been present. The prosecution’s case was based on a secret tip, the apprehension of a co‑accused (Angad Yadav) who identified …

Deonandan Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deonandan Prasad Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 398 of 2025) involving alleged assault, robbery, and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that on 27 Oct 2025 the petitioner’s associates attacked Sanjoga …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, seven residents of Kazipur village, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.350 of 2025 alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that on 20 September 2025 the accused, including the petitioners, assaulted an …

Nandan TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Nandan Tiwari was implicated in a FIR alleging assault with a knife on the informant's son, invoking several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated due to village politics, had no prior criminal record, and that the medical injury report …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners Nitish Kumar and Hiralal Yadav were implicated in a case involving assault and property damage under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Hiralal Yadav, already in judicial custody, withdrew his anticipatory bail application. The court then considered Nitish Kumar's …

ADITYA RAJversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aditya Raj, was implicated in a recruitment fraud case (Airport P.S. Case No.28 of 2019) alleging forgery and cheating under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471, based on a mismatch between his thumb impression and the original sample. He claimed innocence, stating that a …

Ajay Kumar ChoubeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered a petition by Ajay Kumar Choubey, a faculty member, seeking anticipatory bail in a case alleging financial embezzlement by the in‑charge principal Sanjay Kumar Rai involving Rs 70 lakhs of college funds. The prosecution alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 409 and …

Ranjan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Sonepur PS Case No. 89 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 96 and 34 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that he, along with co‑accused Dhuri Kumar, abducted the informant’s sister, with a …

Jitendra ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Jitendra Thakur, Shyamsundar Thakur and Golu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Barbigha P.S. Case No. 202 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners entered an informant's …

Tuntun SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Tuntun Sah and Jamdar Sah, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 46 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 326, 307 and 302 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that a dispute over a parked motorcycle led to an assault on the …

Ajay yadavversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners Ajay Yadav, Durba Devi, Bablu Yadav and Champa Devi applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Halsi P.S. Case No. 287 of 2025) involving offences such as assault, theft of jewellery and alleged outraging of modesty. During the pendency of the application, …

Ramji PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with a case of alleged extortion and assault under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Petitioners No.3 and No.5 withdrew their applications after being taken into custody, leaving petitioners No.1, 2 and 4. The …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, six individuals from Shamabad village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Rahui P.S. Case No. 607 of 2025) involving multiple serious offences under the B.N.S. 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a group of about twenty armed persons attacked an …

Lalu Yadav @ Lal Bihari YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Lalu Yadav and Pradeep Kumar, were implicated in a Magadh University police case alleging assault and related offences under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the accused attacked an informant and his brother with weapons, causing injuries and theft of …

Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rupesh Kumar and Raja Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Kharagpur PS Case No. 228 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the accused threw crackers, assaulted the informant’s family with weapons, caused …

Rina Devi @ Reena DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Rina Devi and Rajesh Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Piprahi P.S. Case No. 228 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused had abducted a minor, while the petitioners were only accused of …

Uday Kumar @ Mannu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Nazarmira village, sought anticipatory bail in connection with Sonepur Police Station Case No. 1197 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023, including assault on an informant and theft of cash. The …

MOHD ASIF AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mohd Asif and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the State for renewal of their market licence for Gata No.79 & 100, Ward No.12, Kasba/Nagar Panchayat, Shergarh, Bareilly. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and …

ASHOK KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to release contractual dues of Rs.5,05,240 with interest and to decide the petitioner’s application dated 19‑03‑2025. The standing counsel raised no objection to the petitioner's application being …

JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the competent authority to execute its Section 14 order dated 27 December 2021 for possession of secured assets. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in C. Bright v. District …

JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LTDversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the competent authority to execute its Section 14 order dated 27 December 2021 for possession of secured assets. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court judgment in C. Bright v. District …

SATYENDRA KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Regional Passport Office, Lucknow, to re‑issue his passport without delay. His application was pending because a criminal case (Cr. No. 307 of 2016) involving offences under Sections 323, 504, …

RANG BAHADUR @ RAJ BAHADUR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ to challenge the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0129 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under IPC sections 352 and 351(3) BNS and CrPC section 115(2). No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …

PRASANT SAROJ AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 329 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the IPC. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional …

ARUN YADAV @ MONUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arun Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet (Crime No. 218 of 2025) under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an …

ARSHEEN PARVEZ @ ARSHEEN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Arsheen Parvez and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and seeking relief in connection with Crime No. 208 of 2025, alleged under Section 87 B.N.S. in Gorakhpur. No petitioner appeared before the Court; only the …

MANU KUMARI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manu Kumari and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge‑sheet filed in Crime No. 195 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 61(2). No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was …

YOGANDER AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0214 of 2025 under Sections 85, 109 and 115(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The police had already …

MANGE RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mange Ram, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0385 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the …

MOHD. RAFI AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 49 of 2025, alleging improprieties in the FIR and investigation under various IPC and D.P. Act provisions. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …

NARGISH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge‑sheet in Crime No. 0119 of 2025 under Section 137(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. They sought to quash the FIR and the charge‑sheet on the ground that the police had not properly investigated. The …

AMIT VERMAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Amit Verma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0354 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while …

ABHISHEK GIRIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0217 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under Sections 142, 87, 74 and 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was …

UMESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Umesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0312 of 2024 under Section 103 BNS. The petition sought judicial intervention to question the police's investigation and the charge sheet. The High …

MANISH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Manish and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 402 of 2025 under Section 316(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The …

DILEEP KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ to quash the First Information Report and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0216 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under various IPC sections and the D.P. Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …

SHASHANK @ SHASHANK BIND @ BHOLUversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Shashank @ Shashank Bind @ Bholu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 442 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 87 BNS. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by Additional Government …

PRAMOD KUMARversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 176 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under Sections 69, 191(2), 115(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while …

YOGENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Yogendra Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 177 of 2025 under Sections 329(3) of the BNS and Sections 2, 3, 5 of the Prevention of Damages of Public Property Act, 1984. The High Court noted that the charge …

AMAR SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Amar Singh and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0183 of 2025 under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by Additional …

NAROTTAM DAS PATELversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Narottam Das Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0077 of 2025 under Section 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petition was filed despite the petitioner’s absence, and the State was represented by an …

DEEPAK CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deepak Chauhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet (Crime No. 0860 of 2025) under Sections 310(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an …

SANJAY ALIAS SANJU PATERIAversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjay Alias Sanju Pateria, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet (Crime No. 232 of 2025) under several sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The petition sought to quash the charge sheet on the ground that the FIR was …

KRISHNA SHUKLA ALIAS GOLO SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Krishna Shukla alias Golo Shukla filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 21133 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 300 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under several IPC sections. No petitioner appeared before the court, …

VIJAY SHANKAR BIND @ VIJAY SHANKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0256 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under various IPC and D.P. Act provisions. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional …

SMT. VIMLESH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Vimlesh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 199 of 2025 under Sections 87 BNS. The petition was presented without any petitioner appearing before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …

X MINORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, represented by counsel, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 331 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under Sections 69, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. No petitioner …

SMT. PRACHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Prachi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 533 of 2025 under Section 87 of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional …

NANDKESH MISHRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Nandkesh Mishra and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0020 of 2025 under Sections 85, 80(2), 352 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dangerous Drugs and …

VINAY @ VIJAY SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Vinay @ Vijay Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0263 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 80(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs …

RADHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Radha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR (Crime No. 0367 of 2024) that alleged her involvement in offences under Sections 352, 115(2), 333, 109, 118(2) and 191(1) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, while the State …

KHALID AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Khalid and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 113 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under various IPC sections. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while the State was represented by the …

SMT. NEHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Neha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0087 of 2025, which involved offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought to question the first information report and the subsequent charge …

RAJKUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Rajkumar and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet in Crime No. 383 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 61(2)(a), 111, 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, …

MUKHIYA GURJAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners sought a writ to quash the First Information Report and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 254 of 2025, alleging their involvement in offences under various IPC sections. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The …

BRIJENDRA KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Brijendra Kumar Yadav and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 136 of 2025 under Sections 80, 85, 351(2), 352 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. The petitioners were not present to press the writ, while the …

HEMLATA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Hemlata and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 223 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under Sections 85, 80 BNS read with Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, while …

SONU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sonu Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0313 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an …

SMT. RADHA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Radha and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 289 of 2025, which involved sections 191(2), 331(6), 351(3) and 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court; only the …

VIKRAM SINGH BHADAURIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vikram Singh Bhadauria, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0348 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …

SACHINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sachin, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0087 of 2025 under Sections 316(5), 317(4) and 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, but the State was represented by an Additional …

GURMEET KAUR @ HEENA AND 2 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0649 of 2024, which involved Sections 115(2), 109(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 76 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, but the State was …

RAJIT KUMAR @ RAJAT SINGHversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ to challenge the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 327 of 2024, relating to an FIR under Section 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted …

RAMESH PRAJAPATI AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0348 of 2024 under Sections 87, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while an Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The …

RAHUL YADAV AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rahul Yadav and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 335 of 2024. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by Additional …

MOGEES AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mogees and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 384 of 2024, which was based on an FIR under Sections 82(1), 85, 351(2), 115(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought judicial intervention to …

RAM NAIN YADAV AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

Ram Nain Yadav and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 627 of 2024 under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. No petitioner appeared before the Court; …

BUNTI @ JITENDRA AND 14 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 514 of 2024, which involved alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 125 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought relief against the FIR and the subsequent …

RAMU PANDIT @ RAM PATHAK AND ANOTHERversusThe State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Ramu Pandit and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge‑sheet in Crime No. 0328 of 2024, which arose from an FIR under IPC sections 109, 190, 191(2) and 191(3). The petition sought to quash the FIR/charge‑sheet on the ground that the …

RAHUL KUMARversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 366 of 2024 (Sections 331(4), 305(a), 62 BNS) by the Saharanpur Police. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by Additional …

SMT KAJAL DEVI AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Kajal Devi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0513 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under Sections 87, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought judicial intervention to quash …

PARMJEET SINGH AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 333 of 2024, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and a Uttar Pradesh minor minerals rule. The petition sought judicial intervention to quash the …

VAIBHAVI SRIVASTAVA ALIAS GARIMA AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0432 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under Sections 80(2) & 85 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Delhi Police Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, …

Seema KumariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Seema Kumari, a teacher employed under the Bihar Department of Education, challenged a removal order dated 12 September 2022 that terminated her service on the ground of an alleged forged certificate. She also contested a salary suspension order issued on 11 March 2022, arguing that …

Mahesh JhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mahesh Jha filed a writ petition challenging a pay slip issued by the Bihar Education Department's Pay Verification Cell that reduced his salary from the Rs. 98,200 fixed by the Statutory Pay Fixation Committee to Rs. 84,700. The petitioner argued that the reduction violated the committee's fixation …

Raju Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raju Kumar Yadav, who has been working as a peon since 2010, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Bihar and its education authorities to absorb him into regular government service under Resolution No. 908 (2014) and Memo No. 218 (2016). He had earlier submitted …

Mithilesh Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithilesh Kumar Choudhary filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Collector to dispose of his pending Land Encroachment Appeal No. 06 of 2024, filed under Section 11 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956. The petitioner alleged that the Circle Officer was threatening to evict him …

Shail KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shail Kumari, a divorced daughter of a deceased government employee, filed a writ petition seeking family pension under a 2018 Finance Department resolution that provides pension to unmarried, divorced or widowed daughters of government employees up to age 25. She alleged that the …

Dr. Shiv Shankar PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a retired associate professor of Gram Bharti College, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the university and the State of Bihar to pay his pending gratuity, earned leave, and related dues, along with penal interest. He contended that his service was regularized, he was …

Md. ZeyauddinversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Zeyauddin, sought a writ directing the State of Bihar and its education officials to implement an order dated 19‑11‑2025 of the Teachers Appellate Tribunal that granted him appointment as an Urdu Teacher. He alleged that despite a subsequent letter (No. 97 dated 08‑01‑2026) from …

Kajal KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a BPSC General Teacher, filed a writ petition seeking an order of transfer within Supaul Nagar Parishad, citing a transfer policy issued by the Bihar Education Department that allows transfers on special circumstances. She applied through the e‑Shikshakosh portal on 11‑12‑2024, …

Anupma RaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a PGT Science teacher appointed by the BPSC, sought a transfer to a school nearer her residence after being posted to a high school 40 km away, invoking a special‑circumstances clause in the Education Department's transfer policy for female teachers. She argued that the posting …

Nilam KumariversusThe State of Bihar, through the Additional Chief Secretary,

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nilam Kumari, a science teacher appointed in Bhojpur, filed a writ petition seeking a transfer to a school in Patna district, citing the Education Department's transfer policy (Memo No. 1729/2024) and the serious health condition of her mother‑in‑law. She had applied through the …

Lal Bahadur SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, two teachers, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an Office Order dated 24 May 2025 and demanding promotion to the Graduate Trained Pay Scale and the post of Head Master as per the Bihar Primary Teachers (Promotion) Rules, 1993 and earlier High Court judgments. They also …

Ram Sagar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Sagar Sharma, a superannuated Class‑IV employee of the Water Resources Department, filed a writ petition seeking the differential gratuity and leave‑encashment he claimed were due under a 2020 judgment (C.W.J.C. No.3416). The petitioner argued that his service, though recorded as 3 years 5 …

Anupam RaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a General Teacher of English appointed to a school in Paliganj, filed a writ petition seeking a transfer within Patna Municipal Corporation under the Education Department's transfer policy (Memo No. 1729, 07‑10‑2024). She claimed hardship because her husband, a non‑transferable …

Malti KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Malti Kumari appeared for the Secondary Teacher Eligibility Test‑2025 and scored 59.7359 marks, falling short of the 60‑mark cutoff by 0.25 marks, leading to her being declared unqualified. She submitted representations to the Bihar School Examination Board on 5 February 2026 and 24 …

Mohan Prasad SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a BPSC General Teacher, filed a writ petition seeking an order of transfer within Supaul Nagar Parishad, citing a transfer policy issued by the Bihar Education Department that allows transfers on special circumstances. She applied through the e‑Shikshakosh portal on 11‑12‑2024, …

Raj Narayan PoddarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court heard a consolidated lead writ petition (CWJC No.17271 of 2023) and several related petitions filed by retired health‑department employees whose pensions were abruptly stopped by the State of Bihar on the ground that their original appointments were illegal or forged. The …

Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court heard a consolidated group of writ petitions filed by retired health‑department employees whose pensions had been stopped on the ground that their original appointments were illegal or forged. The petitioners argued that they had served continuously for decades, received …

Kuwar Munni Devi @ Munni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court heard a consolidated group of civil writ petitions filed by retired health‑department employees whose pensions had been stopped by the State of Bihar on the ground that their original appointments were illegal or forged. The petitioners argued that they had served continuously, …

Pawan Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court heard a consolidated group of civil writ petitions filed by retired health‑department employees whose pensions had been stopped by the State of Bihar on the ground that their original appointments were illegal or forged. The petitioners argued that they had served continuously, …

Satyadeo SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court heard a consolidated group of civil writ petitions filed by retired health‑department employees whose pensions had been stopped by the State of Bihar on the ground that their original appointments were illegal or forged. The petitioners argued that they had served continuously, …

Shail DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court heard a consolidated lead writ petition (CWJC No.17271 of 2023) and several related petitions filed by retired health‑department employees whose pensions were abruptly stopped by the State of Bihar on the ground that their original appointments were illegal or forged. The …

Akhileshwar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court heard a consolidated group of civil writ petitions filed by retired health‑department employees whose pensions had been stopped by the State of Bihar on the ground that their original appointments were illegal or forged. The petitioners argued that they had served continuously, …

Vina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vina Devi, the second wife of a deceased government employee, filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an order dated 31‑08‑2024 issued by the District Service Grievance Redressal Officer that rejected her claim to family pension. She argued that she was named as nominee in the pension records and …

Ashutosh SharanversusThe State of Bihar through the Secretary,

DISPOSED

Ashutosh Sharan, a retired government employee, had his entire pension withheld under Bihar Pension Rule 43(B) following a disciplinary proceeding. The inquiry officer’s report exonerated him, but the disciplinary authority issued a show‑cause notice disagreeing with the report and later passed an …

Ms Chanchal KumariversusThe Union of India, through the Secretary,

DISPOSED

Ms. Chanchal Kumari, the widow of a deceased Sashastra Seema Bal employee, filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of letters that delayed her family pension, terminal dues, and accidental insurance benefits. She alleged that the State Bank of India branches unjustifiably refused to process her …

Ashutosh SharanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ashutosh Sharan, a retired employee, had his entire pension withheld under Bihar Pension Rule 43(B) following a departmental disciplinary proceeding. The inquiry officer’s report exonerated him, but the disciplinary authority disagreed, issued a show‑cause notice and, despite the petitioner’s second …

Shatrunjay Prasad Singh @ Kanhaiya SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shatrunjay Prasad Singh filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the authorities, particularly the Circle Officer, to conclude Encroachment Case No.02/2024-25 concerning public land (Khesara No. 1907, 1911 & 1930) in Bhojpur district. The petitioner alleged that, although notices under Section 3 …

Sushil Sharma @ Sushil Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sushil Sharma, sought bail in a kidnapping case (PS Case No. 48 of 2024) where he was alleged to have participated in the abduction of a minor under IPC sections 363, 366(A), 34, the SC/ST (POA) Act and the POCSO Act. He contended that the FIR was filed after an inordinate delay, …

Chintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Chintu Kumar and Pinku Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with an FIR alleging assault and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners had assaulted an informant during a village dispute, causing only simple …

Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Khanpur P.S. Case No.22 of 2025) alleging participation in a Tiranga rally that allegedly caused inconvenience to passengers and ambulances. The FIR charges them under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including …

Manoj Ram @ Manoj Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Ram sought bail in a 2009 case (PS No. 348) involving alleged possession of a country-made pistol under Sections 25(1‑b), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The FIR described a pistol found near Ashok Kumar Singh’s house, loaded with a cartridge that misfired. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating …

Ajay Kumar Singh @ Ajay SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Sahpur village, were implicated in Sonepur Police Station Case No. 42 of 2026 for alleged offences including murder, attempt to murder, and other violent crimes under the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that on 12 January 2026 the accused, armed with swords and …

Dr. Sandeep Pahal,versusThe Union of India

WITHDRAWN

Dr. Sandeep Pahal filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the Union of India, the Ministry of Education, the University Grants Commission and Mahatma Gandhi Central University. The petitioner later sought permission to withdraw the pending application while reserving the …

Chandeshwar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, relatives of the informant, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving assault and other offences under the B.N.S. 2023. Petitioner's No.1 was already in custody and his bail application was withdrawn. The court examined the FIR alleging that the petitioners, armed with …

Dhirendra MishraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhirendra Mishra, a senior citizen and PDS dealer, was implicated in a case (PS Case No.302 of 2025) alleging large‑scale misappropriation of wheat and rice meant for the Public Distribution System, invoking Sections 303(2) and 318(4) of the B.N.S. and Section 7 of the Essential …

Chandan Patel @ Chandan Kumar PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Patel, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where an informant was allegedly assaulted and robbed. The prosecution alleged that a group of persons attacked the informant, causing unconsciousness and theft of Rs.5,200, charging the petitioner under several …

Shiv Shankar Choudhary @ Rahul @ ShivshankarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shiv Shankar Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Banka P.S. Case No. 562 of 2025) where an FIR alleged that he and co‑accused assaulted an informant, attempted to abduct the informant's three‑year‑old daughter, and confined the informant's wife. The …

Gopal DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gopal Das and Moti Kumar sought bail in a criminal case (Kadirganj PS Case No. 181 of 2025) where they were alleged to have assaulted an informant with iron rods, causing a shoulder fracture and assaulting his family. The prosecution charged them under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The …

Golu Kumar @ Golu @ Raushan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Rampur (Khoram), sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Gaura PS No.187 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that on 10 September 2025 the accused, armed …

Tuntun Choudhary @ Tuntun Kumar @ Tuntun ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Tuntun Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping and human trafficking case (PS Case No. 14 of 2026) under Sections 137(2), 140(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the informant's daughter was abducted by …

Vijay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.14/2025) alleging his participation in an unlawful assembly that assaulted police executing a warrant. The prosecution alleged his involvement in multiple offences under sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), …

Badal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Badal Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a theft case (PS Case No. 491 of 2024) involving a stolen motorcycle. The prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement of co‑accused Rajnikant Kumar, who had already been granted regular bail, and no incriminating material was found in …

Nikku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Nikku Kumar sought anticipatory bail in connection with a 2023 FIR alleging assault under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506/34, arising from a land dispute with the informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused Anuj Singh assaulted the informant, his wife and …

Sudesh Kumar Singh @ Sundesh Singh @ Sudesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sudesh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR (Case No.77 of 2025) alleging his involvement in an assault on his brother and others, with charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was among …