Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kamal Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Summary

Kamal Kumar Sharma filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Bihar and its officials. While the petition was pending, the petitioner informed the court that his grievance had been redressed and he wished to withdraw the writ. The petitioner’s counsel submitted a request for withdrawal, which was taken up before the bench. The court examined the request and, finding no objection from the respondents, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition pending before the High Court can be withdrawn by the petitioner and the court may dismiss it as withdrawn.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • petition dismissed
  • High Court of Patna

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17742 of 2025
                  ======================================================
                  Kamal Kumar Sharma Son of Kameshwar Prasad Sharma, Resident of
                  Village- Ismailchak, P.O- Gobind Chak, P.S. Sonepur, District- Saran, Bihar,
                  retired Panchayat Secretary, Dariyapur Block Office, District- Saran.

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
            2.    The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
            3.    The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.
            4.    The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Saran at Chapra.
            5.    The Treasury Officer, Saran Treasury, Chapra.

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr Brajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s   :      Mr Sunil Kr Mandal, SC III with
                                                Mr Bipin Kr, AC to SC III
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    30-04-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2 Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that

                    during pendency of this writ petition, the grievance of the

                    petitioner has been redressed and he prays to withdraw this writ

                    petition.

                                3 Prayer is allowed.

                                4 This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Ajit Kumar, J)
M.E.H./-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.