Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail must be granted as the alleged liquor was not recovered from the petitioners' conscious possession and the investigation did not substantiate the charge.

Summary

The petitioners, three villagers, were charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 120 litres of liquor from the bank of the Ganga River. They had prior excise cases but were not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in their conscious possession; the allegation stemmed from a chowkidar’s information. The petitioners had been in custody since 19‑12‑2025 and argued that the investigation was mechanical and lacked proper evidence. The State opposed bail. The court, noting the absence of direct possession, the lack of substantive investigation, and the prolonged detention, ordered their release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.55,000 with two sureties each.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act given the circumstances of the alleged offence and their prior records.

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise law
  • Section 30(a)
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • conscious possession
  • police investigation

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1567 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-860 Year-2025 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Bablu Kumar Son of Sanjay Singh Resident of village- Baburbani, ps-
                  Sonepur, Dist- Saran at Chapra
           2.    Satyendra Rai @ Satyendra Kumar son of Badan Rai @ Rambadan Rai
                 Resident of village- Baburbani, ps- Sonepur, Dist- Saran at Chapra
           3.     Shailendra Rai @ Shailendra Kumar @ Sailendra Ray Son of Amir Rai
                  Resident of village- Baburbani, ps- Sonepur, Dist- Saran at Chapra
                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Gulnar Begum, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. Petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the

                   offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   petitioner no.1 has antecedents of seven cases out of which three

                   cases are under the Excise Act, petitioner no.2 has antecedents

                   of six cases under the Excise Act and petitioner no.3 has

                   antecedents of eleven cases out of which three cases are under

                   the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 120 litres of

                   liquor from bank of Ganga river. It is next submitted that
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1567 of 2026(2) dt.30-01-2026
                                                           2/2




                         petitioners were not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was

                         recovered from their conscious possession and even alleged

                         recovery is from a place which does not belong to the

                         petitioners but then is accessible to villagers at large and they

                         came to be implicated at the instance of Chowkidar based on

                         which subsequently the police arrested them. It is also submitted

                         that once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise,

                         the police starts implicating mechanically either at the instance

                         of Chowkidar, local person, confessional statement or secret

                         information without holding a proper investigation. It is also

                         submitted that the petitioners are in custody since 19.12.2025.

                                      4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

                                      5. Considering the submissions made by learned

                         counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, are

                         directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of

                         Rs.55,000/- (Rupees Fifty Five Thousand) each with two

                         sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2 nd

                         Exclusive Special Excise Judge, Saran at Chapra in connection

                         with Sonpur P.S. Case No.860 of 2025.


                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Sanjay/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.