Patna High Court
Dilip Mahto @ Dilip Rai @ Kari MahtoversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The Court held that a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application, leading to its dismissal.
Summary
Petitioner Dilip Mahto had filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. While the application was pending, he was arrested. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn by the petitioner after arrest
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- arrest
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1580 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHAUL District- Begusarai
======================================================
Dilip Mahto @ Dilip Rai @ Kari Mahto Son of Maheshwar Mahto Resident
of village - Manjhaul Ward No.- 10, P.S.- Manjhaul, District - Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nakul Kumar Jamuar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 21-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail
application was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the
same.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail
application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-
U T
Checking your session…