Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sunil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Sunil Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then moved the court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16063 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2016 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai
                  ======================================================
                  Sunil Yadav S/O Baleshwar Yadav Resident of village- Sohma, P.S- Bithan,
                  District- Samastipur, Bihar.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Prabhat Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Shantanu Kumar
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    28-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail application

                    was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

                               3. Permission is accorded.

                                    4.Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                           (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.