Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanny Rauat @ Sunny RauatversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Sanny Rauat applied for anticipatory bail. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • arrest

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16078 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-434 Year-2025 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai
                  ======================================================
                  Sanny Rauat @ Sunny Rauat S/o Vinod Rauat R/o Village - Bakhri, Ward No.
                  26, P.S - Bakhri, District - Begusarai

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                           ... ... Opposite Party
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Sunil Kumar Yadav, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, A.P.P.
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    17-03-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    APP for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    petitioner, during pendency of the anticipatory bail application,

                    was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4.    Accordingly,        the     instant     anticipatory       bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.