Patna High Court
Neha KumariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- R P MISHRA
Holding
The Court granted bail to the petitioner, finding no material incriminating her and noting procedural deficiencies and parity with the co‑accused.
Summary
The petitioner, Neha Kumari, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a police raid recovered four country‑made pistols and cartridges from a co‑accused, Kallu Kumar. The petitioner contended that no arms were found in her possession and that she had been falsely implicated, noting that the co‑accused had already been granted bail. She had been in custody since 4 October 2025 and possessed one prior criminal record, but the State had not complied with Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The Court, considering the lack of incriminating material against the petitioner, the parity with the co‑accused, and the procedural lapse, decided to grant bail. Bail was set at Rs. 15,000 with two sureties of the same amount each.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under the Arms Act despite the seriousness of the offences and her prior criminal antecedent
- Whether the non‑compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, warrants granting bail
- Whether parity with the co‑accused, who was already released on bail, influences the bail decision
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 25(1-b)(a), 26, 35
- Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 103
Subjects
- bail
- Arms Act
- Section 103
- parity
- criminal antecedent
- procedural lapse
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16089 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-738 Year-2025 Thana- MANER District- Patna
======================================================
Neha Kumari Daughter of Late Vijendra Prasad Resident of Village- Hulasi
Tola, Police Station -Maner, Dist- Patna At present Resident of village-
Saguna More near Samudayik Bhawan, Ps- Danapur, Dist- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
2 13-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP
for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Maner P.S.
Case No. 738 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections
25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the F.I.R., on secret information, police
conducted a raid and apprehended Kallu Kumar with four
country-made pistols and cartridges.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No
incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious
possession of the petitioner rather the recovery of the arms has
been made from the co-accused. Learned counsel further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16089 of 2026(2) dt.13-03-2026
2/2
submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the recovered
arms and ammunitions. It has been submitted on behalf of the
petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 04.10.2025 and
has one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section
103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Other
co-accused has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated
10.03.2026, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10164 of 2026.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed
the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of
the case as also the period of custody undergone by the
petitioner and claim based on parity, this Court is inclined to
grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail
bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court
below/concerned Court in connection with Maner P.S. Case No.
738 of 2025.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Raj Kishore/-
U T
Checking your session…