Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed the petition.

Summary

Petitioner Pintu Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. While the application was pending, he was arrested. The petitioner then sought permission from the court to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16115 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-616 Year-2025 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Pintu Kumar Son of Sri Gama Chaudhary Resident of Village- Bagahi,
                  Nimiya Tola, P.S.- Bairiya, District- West Champaran

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Sharad Kumar Verma
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms.Veena Kumari Jaiswal
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    17-03-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks

                    permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application

                    as petitioner, during pendency of the same, was arrested.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.