Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Maga Ram SahniversusState Of Bihar and Anr

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court disposed of the criminal miscellaneous application, granting the petitioner liberty to raise his points before the trial court.

Summary

The petitioner, Maga Ram Sahni, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashment of FIR No. 204 of 2010 registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The State had already filed a charge sheet on 29 August 2010. The petitioner prayed that the case be disposed of while allowing him to raise all points before the trial court at the appropriate stage. The State’s Additional Public Prosecutor raised no objection to this prayer. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted the petitioner's request, disposing of the application and permitting the petitioner to present his arguments before the trial court. No substantive order on the merits of the FIR was made.

Issues considered

  • Whether the FIR registered under Sections 341, 323, 285, 307, 504 and 34 of the IPC can be quashed under Section 482 of the CrPC.
  • Whether the petitioner may be granted liberty to raise all points before the trial court while the application is disposed.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Criminal Procedure
  • Section 482
  • Quash of FIR
  • High Court
  • Petition
  • Trial Court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16203 of 2018
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2010 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL District-
                                                         Begusarai
                  ======================================================
                  Maga Ram Sahni Son of Mahadev Sahni, resident of Village- Ward No. 3
                  Naya Tola Mohanpur, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Begusarai.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar.
            2.    Ashok Sahni, son of Shiru Sahni, resident of Village- Naya Tola Mohanpur,
                  P.S.- Mufassil, District- Begusarai.

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Randhir Kumar No.1, Advocate.
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, A.P.P.
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                        ORAL ORDER

10   22-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed

                    under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the F.I.R. bearing

                    Begusarai Mufassil P.S. Case No.204 of 2010 registered under

                    Section 341, 323, 285, 307, 504/34 of the I.P.C against the

                    petitioner and other accused persons.

                                 3. A counter affidavit on behalf of State has been filed

                    by Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, learned A.P.P., in which it is stated

                    that charge sheet has already been filed in this case by the then

                    I.O. on 29.08.2010.

                                 4. After some argument, learned counsel for the
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16203 of 2018(10) dt.22-06-2026
                                                          2/2




                        petitioner submits that this case may be disposed of with liberty

                        to the petitioner to take all the points as raised in the petition,

                        before the learned Trial Court at appropriate stage in accordance

                        with law.

                                     5. Learned APP for the State has no objection to this

                        prayer of the petitioner.

                                     6. In view of the above, the present Cr. Misc.

                        Application is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner, as

                        prayed for.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.