Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Arbind Ram @ Arvind RamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

Summary

Arbind Ram was arrested in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 176 of 2025, charged under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118, 303(2), 351(1), 352, 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod, causing a hair‑line fracture of the skull. He applied for bail, asserting that he is innocent, that the injury was minor and the incident was a trivial dispute between co‑villagers, and that he has been in judicial custody since 20‑12‑2025. The State opposed bail, pointing to three prior criminal cases against the petitioner. After hearing both sides, the court considered the nature of the injury, the seriousness of the offences and the petitioner’s antecedents, and decided that bail could be granted with conditions. The court ordered that the petitioner be released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑II, Siwan. The order was delivered by Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the seriousness of the charges and his prior criminal antecedents?

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S., 2023 — s. 109, 115(2), 118, 126(2), 303(2), 3(5), 351(1), 352

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal antecedent
  • assault
  • injury report
  • judicial custody
  • surety
  • B.N.S. 2023

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16352 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2025 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Arbind Ram @ Arvind Ram S/o- Dharamnath Ram Resident of Village - Akil
                 Tola, P.S. - Maharajganj, District - Siwan

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   22-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 176 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118, 303(2),

                   351(1), 352, 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   petitioner has assaulted the informant on the head with an iron

                   rod, due to which he fell down.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. He also submits that the informant and the petitioner are

                   both co-villagers and the offence has taken place on a trivial
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16352 of 2026(3) dt.22-04-2026
                                                       2/2




                     issue. He further submits that from perusal of the injury report,

                     it will transpire that a hairline fracture at the vault of the skull

                     was found. He further submits that there was no repetition of the

                     blow, and only a hairline fracture has been found on the skull.

                     Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since

                     20.12.2025.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State and submits that the petitioner has criminal

                     antecedent of three cases.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Siwan in connection

                     with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 176 of 2025.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.