Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rajani KashyapversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajani Kashyap, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged supply of minor girls for dancing in an orchestra, and charged under multiple sections of the BNS, the POCSO Act, the Juvenile Justice Act and the Bonded Labour System (Abolish) Act. The prosecution alleged her participation in the alleged exploitation, while the petitioner’s counsel contended that no specific allegation was made against her, she had no criminal antecedent and co‑accused had already been granted bail. The State opposed the bail application. After hearing both sides, the court considered the lack of specific charges, the petitioner’s custody since 4 December 2025, and the precedent of bail to co‑accused. The court decided to grant regular bail, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The bail order was made to the satisfaction of the District Judge‑VII cum Special Judge, POCSO, Biharsharif, Nalanda.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner despite charges under the BNS, POCSO Act, Juvenile Justice Act and Bonded Labour System (Abolish) Act
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of specific allegation and clean record warrant bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • POCSO
  • Juvenile Justice Act
  • Bonded Labour System (Abolish) Act
  • minor exploitation
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16443 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-676 Year-2025 Thana- RAJGIR District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
                 Rajani Kashyap W/o Shankar Rajput R/0 Village - Singhola Khurd, P.S - Nari,
                 District - Meruth, State - Uttar Pradesh

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Krishna Deo Raj, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   13-03-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 143(2), 145,

                   74, 111(4) and 3(5) of BNS, Section 8 of POCSO Act, Section

                   75 and 79 of J.J. Act and Section 16, 17 and 18 of Bonded

                   Labour System (Abolish) Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner

                   along with other persons called the girls for dancing in orchestra

                   who are arrested from the place of occurrence.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned

                   counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no specific

                   allegation against this petitioner. Only allegation against her is
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16443 of 2026(2) dt.13-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                      that she was also involved in supplying the girls for dancing in

                      orchestra. She is not engaged in exploitation of minor girls or

                      cruelty with any child. Similarly situated other co-accused

                      persons have already been granted bail by learned co-ordinate

                      Bench of this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 1491 of 2026. Moreover,

                      the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 04.12.2025

                      having no criminal antecedent.

                                   5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                      vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                      petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with

                      Rajgir P.S. Case No. 676 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of

                      Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                      each to the satisfaction of learned District Judge-VII cum

                      Special Judge, POCSO, Biharsharif, Nalanda.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
shubham/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.