Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prem KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
REJECTED

Holding

The court denied bail, holding that the seriousness of the allegations and the victim’s evidence warrant continued custody.

Summary

Prem Kumar was arrested on 11 January 2026 in connection with a rape allegation involving a minor who later became pregnant. The FIR, dated 19 November 2025, charges him under Section 87 and Section 64 of the B.N.S., 2023 as well as Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he has a clean record and is falsely implicated, while the State presented the victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. and a medical report confirming a seven‑month pregnancy. The court examined the seriousness of the allegations, the victim’s corroborative evidence, and the risk of tampering with evidence. Concluding that the allegations are specific and direct, the court refused the bail application, keeping the petitioner in custody.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case of alleged rape of a minor under the B.N.S., 2023 and the POCSO Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • rape
  • minor
  • POCSO
  • Section 87 B.N.S.
  • Section 64 B.N.S.
  • Section 4 POCSO
  • Section 6 POCSO
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • pregnancy
  • false implication

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16591 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-831 Year-2025 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka
                 ======================================================
                 Prem Kumar Son of Mahendra Mandal @ Mahendra Kapri R/o Village -
                 Uchchdiha, P.S. - Dhoraiya, District - Banka.
                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.    X Wife of Z R/o Village - Pawai, P.S. - Amarpur, Dist. - Banka.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner        :      Mr. Brij Nandan Prasad, Advocate
                 For the State             :      Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-03-2026                    Heard Mr. Brij Nandan Prasad, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner, and Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-1, learned APP for the

                   State.

                                      2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   11.01.2026, in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 831 of

                   2025, F.I.R. dated 19.11.2025 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Section 87 of the B.N.S., 2023 and later on

                   Chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioner under

                   Sections 64 of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 4 and 6 of the POCSO

                   Act.

                                      3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he has

                   committed rape upon the informant’s minor daughter due to which

                   she got pregnant.

                                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16591 of 2026(2) dt.16-03-2026
                                                           2/2




                         petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated

                         in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as

                         alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has

                         not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R.

                                       5.    Learned APP for the State, on the other hand,

                         vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and

                         submits that the victim was recovered and her statement was

                         recorded under Section 164 of the Cr. P.C./183 of the B.N.S.S. in

                         which she has fully supported the case of the prosecution and as

                         per medical report which was recorded in paragraph-19 of the case

                         diary that the victim is seven months pregnant which suggests that

                         the victim has been sexually assaulted by the petitioner.

                                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

                         the case and there is specific and direct allegation against the

                         petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in

                         connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 831 of 2025 pending in

                         the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-6-cum-Special

                         Judge, POCSO, Banka.

                                         7. Prayer is refused.



Ibrar//-                                                               (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.