Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nafis Alam @ Md. Nafis AlamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court refused to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Petitioner Nafis Alam sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Gaura PS Case No. 174 of 2025) alleging that he and a co-accused committed unnatural sexual acts with a ten‑year‑old boy and recorded the act on video. The offences alleged include sections 64(1) and 351(2)(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, and section 67 of the Information Technology Act. The victim’s statement was recorded under section 183 of the BNSS, supporting the prosecution. The High Court considered the seriousness of the allegations and the victim’s recorded statement. It concluded that the gravity of the charges warranted denial of bail. Consequently, the court refused the petition for anticipatory bail.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate decision on the petition for anticipatory bail in light of the serious sexual offences alleged against the petitioner?
  • Whether the victim’s statement recorded under section 183 BNSS and the nature of the offences preclude the grant of anticipatory bail?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • sexual offences
  • child sexual abuse
  • video recording
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act
  • Information Technology Act
  • BNSS

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16968 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2025 Thana- Gaura P.S. District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Nafis Alam @ Md. Nafis Alam Son of Farez Alam @ Md. Firoz Village-
                 Manjhwaliya, P. S -Gaura, District -Saran

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    X Wife of Y Village- Manjhwaliya, P. S -Gaura, District -Saran

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Alka Panday, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Ms. Pushpa Sinha, A.P.P.
                 For the O.P. No. 2       :         Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh No. 1, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant

                   and the State.

                                2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Gaura P. S. Case No.

                   174 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 64(1), 351(2)(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

                   Section 4/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences

                   Act and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act.

                                3. It is alleged that this petitioner along with co-

                   accused Arbaz Alam committed unnatural sex with 10 year old

                   son of the informant, when he had gone to attend nature’s call in

                   the field and made video of the same. Victim in his statement

                   recorded under Section 183 BNSS has supported the

                   prosecution case.
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16968 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026
                                                          2/2




                                     4. Considering the nature and seriousness of

                        accusation and statement of the victim recorded under Section

                        183 BNSS, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is

                        refused.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.