Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Biranj Chaudhary @ Viran ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted subject to a Rs.5,000 bond and two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Biranj Chaudhary, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor and 2,000 litres of Jawa Mahua from a riverbank, offences punishable under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. He argued that the seized material was not in his possession, the site was public, and he was implicated by a hostile chowkidar, contending that the investigation was mechanical and that he would not flee if released. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the excise offences and the petitioner’s prior cases under the Excise Act. The court considered the lack of direct possession, the circumstances of the alleged recovery, and the petitioner’s custody since 5 January 2026, and found no reason to deny bail. Accordingly, the court ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a Rs.5,000 bond with two sureties of the same amount, to be satisfied by the trial court.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act where no liquor was found in his possession and the alleged recovery was from a public place.

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • prohibition
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar
  • liquor seizure
  • surety

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17080 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1058 Year-2025 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Biranj Chaudhary @ Viran Chaudhary S/o Santan Chaudhary R/o village-
                 Bhadeji, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Vinod Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 30(a) (b) (c) of Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has antecedent of two cases under the Excise Act and

                   allegation is of recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a place near

                   bank of a river along with 2000 litres of Jawa Mahua which was

                   destroyed. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested

                   from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious

                   possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which

                   does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to villagers at

                   large and he came to be implicated at the instance of chowkidar
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17080 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026
                                                         2/2




                       with whom he is on an inimical term. It is also submitted that

                       once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise, the

                       police starts implicating mechanically either through chowkidar,

                       local person, confessional statement or secret information

                       without holding a proper investigation. It is next submitted that

                       petitioner is in custody since 05.01.2026 and charge sheet has

                       been submitted. It is also submitted that if privilege of bail is

                       granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not abscond rather

                       will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.

                                     4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the

                       petitioner.

                                     5. Considering the submissions made by the learned

                       counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is

                       directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of

                       Rs.5000/- (Rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like

                       amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where

                       the case is pending/successor court in connection with Muffasil

                       P.S. Case No.1058/2025.



                                                 (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.