Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kishan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Kishan Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then approached the court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the applicant has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1720 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-672 Year-2025 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa
                  ======================================================
                  Kishan Kumar S/o Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Kumar Rangkarmi @ Pankaj
                  Rangkarmi R/o vill - Mohalla - Bhartiya Nagar, Ward No 26/35 Saharsa, P.S.
                  and Distt.- Saharsa
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                  The State of Bihar
                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Subesh Sharma, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    22-01-2026                     1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                    2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                    that petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                    application was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the

                    same.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                    4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                         (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.