Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chandan Jha @ Chandan Kumar Jha @ Prem Prakash JhaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Chandan Jha, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 509 of 2024) alleged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that unknown miscreants killed the informant's brother and that Jitu Yadav and his associates were responsible. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, citing a confessional statement of co‑accused Jitu Yadav that another person, Chandra Bhushan Yadav, fired the fatal shot, and noting that the autopsy showed only a single entry‑exit wound. The State opposed bail, pointing to the petitioner’s prior criminal case. After hearing both sides, the High Court found the evidence insufficient to justify continued detention and ordered the petitioner to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a murder and arms offence case given the available evidence and the petitioner’s alleged criminal antecedent.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • Arms Act
  • confessional statement
  • criminal antecedent
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17215 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-509 Year-2024 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Chandan Jha @ Chandan Kumar Jha @ Prem Prakash Jha S/o Heerakant Jha
                 R/o Vill- Mahathwal, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, Distt- Darbhanga
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Dineshwar Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 509 of 2024 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the

                   B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution in short is that some

                   unknown miscreants have killed the brother of the informant.

                   The informant believes that Jitu Yadav and his friends have

                   committed this offence.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. During the course of investigation, Jitu Yadav @ Jitendra

                   Kumar Yaduvanshi has given his confessional statement in
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17215 of 2026(2) dt.18-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                      which he has stated that Chandra Bhushan Yadav @ Jhagru

                      Yadav fired at the deceased. Save and except the confessional

                      statement of co-accused namely, Jitu Yadav there is nothing

                      against this petitioner. No role has been attributed to the

                      petitioner. He also submits that from perusal of the order of the

                      learned trial court, it will transpire that only one entry and exit

                      wound was found on the person of the deceased. It means that

                      only one gun shot was fired at the deceased.

                                   5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                      for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal

                      antecedent of one case.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                      petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                      bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                      of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                      Additional       Chief     Judicial     Magistrate-IX,   Darbhanga   in

                      connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 509 of 2024.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.