Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanoj RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Sanoj Rai was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He approached the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court heard arguments from both sides and granted the petitioner's request. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. The order reflects the court's discretion to allow withdrawal of bail applications upon the applicant's request.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may be permitted to withdraw a pending anticipatory bail application

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • bail
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17392 of 2026
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2024 Thana- Roshna District- Katihar
                  ======================================================
                  Sanoj Rai Son of Rajendra Rai R/o Bhatwara, P.S. - Korha, Distt.- Katihar.

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    19-03-2026                     1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                    2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                    that petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                    application was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the

                    same.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                    4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                            (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.