Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

An anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn by the applicant, and the court may dismiss it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS. Case No. 850 of 2025. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Hon'ble Justice Satyavrat Verma considered the request and granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn, thereby concluding the proceedings on the petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn by the applicant and dismissed by the court

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • bail
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17426 of 2026
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-850 Year-2025 Thana- DIGHA District- Patna
                  ======================================================
                  Chandan Kumar Son of Arun Rai Resident of Village- Ramji Chak, Digha,
                  P.S.- Digha, District- Patna

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    20-04-2026                     1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                    2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after some

                    arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail

                    application.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                    4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.