Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manish Kumar @ Manish YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as it was voluntarily withdrawn by the petitioner.

Summary

Manish Kumar, the petitioner, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in connection with a criminal case arising from PS Tekari, Gaya. During the hearing on 20-04-2026, the petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the State and the informant's counsel were present. Justice Satyavrat Verma granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn, without addressing any substantive merits of the bail claim.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application before the court

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • bail
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17456 of 2026
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2025 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya
                  ======================================================
                  Manish Kumar @ Manish Yadav S/O UPENDRA YADAV Resident Of
                  Village- Panchdewta, P.S.- Tekari, Dist.- Gaya

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP
                  For the Informant        :        Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    20-04-2026                     1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                    A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf

                    of the informant.

                                    2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after some

                    arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail

                    application.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                    4. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                           (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.