Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court held that an anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn upon the petitioner's request, and therefore dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Guddu Kumar and Pappu Ray applied for anticipatory bail before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, they were arrested by the police. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The State opposed the withdrawal. The Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.179 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-581 Year-2025 Thana- MALSALAMI District- Patna
                    ======================================================
               1.    Guddu Kumar son of Devendra Rai Resident of Mohalla -Pirdamariya PS
                     -Malsalami Dist -Patna
               2.   Pappu Ray Son of Late Nagdev Ray Resident of Mohalla -Pirdamariya PS
                    -Malsalami Dist -Patna

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                    The State of Bihar

                                                           ... ... Opposite Party/s
                    ======================================================
                    Appearance :
                    For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate
                    For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP
                    ======================================================
                    CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                          ORAL ORDER

2     13-01-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                      APP for the State.

                                   2. Learned counsel              for the petitioners seeks

                      permission to withdraw the instant anticipatory bail application

                      as petitioners were arrested during pendency of the same.

                                   3. Permission is accorded.

                                   4. The instant anticipatory bail application is

                      dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                 (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Sanjay/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.