Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Akhatar ShahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.

Summary

The petitioners, Akhatar Shah, Mumtaz Shah and Shahid Shah, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. The FIR alleged that a dispute over water logging led the petitioners to assault the informant's husband and family. The petitioners argued they have clean records, were falsely implicated, and that the allegations are vague and general. The State opposed the bail. The court, after considering the submissions, directed that the petitioners be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds and sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. The application was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. for the alleged offences
  • Whether the allegations in the FIR are specific enough to deny bail
  • Whether the petitioners are falsely implicated and thus entitled to bail

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 324(2), 329(4), 3(5), 351(2), 352, 76

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • B.N.S.
  • false implication
  • assault
  • water logging dispute
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18371 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2025 Thana- PARSATHUA District- Rohtas
                 ======================================================
           1.     Akhatar Shah Son of Late Ramjan Shah Resident of Village - Parasathua,
                  P.S. - Parsathua, Dist. - Rohtas.
           2.    Mumtaz Shah @ Mumtaz Son of Late Ramjan Shah Resident of Village -
                 Parasathua, P.S. - Parsathua, Dist. - Rohtas.
           3.    Shahid Shah @ Kalu Shah Son of Mumtaj Shah Resident of Village -
                 Parasathua, P.S. - Parsathua, Dist. - Rohtas.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Praveen Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms.Suman Kumari Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their

                   arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 126(2), 115(2), 76, 303(2), 352, 329(4), 324(2), 351(2),

                   3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the

                   informant alleges that on 28.06.2025, on account of heavy rain,

                   water started logging at her door. Further, her neighbour Akhtar

                   started filling mud in order to stop the flow of the water. On
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18371 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026
                                            2/3




          objection by her husband, the accused persons started abusing

          and assaulting her husband and when informant and her son

          came to save him, the accused assaulted them.

                       4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by

          the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the

          allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that

          informant and petitioners are neighbour and on account of

          dispute relating to water logging, the occurrence is alleged to

          have taken place. It is next submitted that allegation of assault is

          not specific rather is general and omnibus in nature and

          petitioners are not criminals.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail

          application.

                       6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the

          event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

          within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on

          anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.

          10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court

          where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18371 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026
                                                           3/3




                         Parasthua P. S. Case No.64 of 2025, subject to the conditions

                         laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.

                                      7. The application stands allowed.



                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.