Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ram Babu Sahni @ Ram Babu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Ram Babu Sahni applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the manufacturing and sale of illicit country-made liquor. The police raid on a co-accused's house recovered 50 litres of illicit liquor and equipment, and the petitioner was alleged to have protested, freed an arrested person and threatened the police. The petitioner contended that he had no involvement and that his name was disclosed only by the arrested co-accused. The court noted that the liquor was recovered from the co-accused's premises, not the petitioner's, and that the allegations did not warrant denial of bail. Accordingly, the court granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail despite allegations of involvement in the illicit liquor offence
  • Whether the disclosure of the petitioner's name by co-accused persons suffices to justify denial of bail
  • Whether Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 can be invoked to grant anticipatory bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • prohibition law
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 482
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bihar Prohibition Act
  • false implication

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18533 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2026 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Ram Babu Sahni @ Ram Babu Kumar S/o- Ram Kumar Sahni R/v-
                 Bhagwatpur Dharampur Ps Dist- Vaishali

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Ranjit Kumar Thakur
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Ms.Veena Kumari Jaiswal
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-04-2026         1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                            Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                       2.   This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of

                            Vaishali Police Station Case No. 24 of 2026, dated

                            09.01.2026,        disclosing        offence        under       Sections

                            190/132/121(1)/263 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

                            and Sections 30(a)/45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                            Act, 2016.

                       3.   The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report,

                            is that the police, on secret information that Gautam Sahni

                            and Bandhan Kumari are indulged in the manufacturing

                            and sale of illicit country-made liquor in their house,

                            raided the house of Gautam Sahni, and on seeing the

                            police, the persons who were manufacturing the illicit
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18533 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                            2/3




                   liquor, started fleeing away, but the police apprehended

                   three persons out of them, who disclosed their names as

                   Gautam Sahni, Satyendra Sahni and Ajit Kumar. In the

                   mean while, the petitioner, along with nine other persons,

                   gathered there and started protesting against the police

                   and also freed one of the apprehended person, namely,

                   Ajit Kumar. The petitioner, along with others abused the

                   police, and threatened the police to inflict knife blows

                   upon them. On search of the house of the co-accused

                   Gautam Sahni, the police recovered 50 litres of illicit

                   country-made liquor and equipment for manufacturing

                   country-made liquor.

              4.   Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

                   this case on the disclosure of his names by the arrested

                   co-accused persons. He further submits that the petitioner

                   has got no concern with the illicit liquor recovered

                   inasmuch as the illicit liquor has been recovered from the

                   house of co-accused Gautam Sahni and not this petitioner.

              5.   Regards being had to the submission advanced on behalf

                   of the parties concerned and taking into consideration the

                   fact that the illicit liquor has been recovered from the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18533 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                               house of co-accused Gautam Sahni and not from the

                               vehicle or premises of this petitioner and the name of the

                               petitioner has been disclosed by the arrested co-accused

                               persons, I am inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of

                               anticipatory bail.

                          6.   This application is, accordingly, allowed.

                          7.   Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest

                               or surrender before the Court below within four weeks, be

                               released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

                               (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

                               to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise

                               Court No. 2, Vaishali, at Hajipur, in connection with

                               Vaishali Police Station Case No. 24 of 2026, subject to

                               the condition laid down under Section 482 (2) of the

                               Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.



                                                                           (Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)
Prabhakar Anand/-

U √     T   √


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.