Rabin Mukhiya @ Ravin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18642 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Rabin Mukhiya @ Ravin Kumar Son of Raj Kumar Mukhiya Resident of
                 Village- Bhith, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Abhishek Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his

                   arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2),

                   109(1), 132, 121(1), 121(2), 125(a), 125(b), 221,                          192,

                   61(2), 263, 324(4) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms

                   Act.

                                3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the

                   informant alleges that petitioner is a young boy aged about 19

                   years and in sum and substance the allegation is that under the

                   leadership of Ramprit, a mob gathered for freeing the

                   apprehended accused involved in liquor trade and the accused
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18642 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026
                                            2/3




          were identified based on video footage.

                       4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case with

          general and omnibus allegation. It is also submitted that

          petitioner resides nearby the place of occurrence, as such, when

          ruckus was being created, he out of inquisitiveness came to the

          place of occurrence and thereafter came to be implicated. It is

          also submitted that petitioner is a young boy and in the nature of

          allegation if he sent to judicial custody, his entire career would

          get jeopardized and chances are bright that he may come in

          contact with hardened criminals.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail

          application.

                       6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

          within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail

          on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees

          Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is

          pending/successor Court in connection with Bhagwanpur P. S.

          Case No.316 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18642 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026
                                                           3/3




                         Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. with a further condition that one

                         of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father namely, Raj

                         Kumar Mukhiya.

                                      7. The application stands allowed.



                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T