Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manish Paswan @ Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Manish Paswan was arrested in connection with a case under sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he took away a 15‑year‑old girl for marriage. The informant’s daughter later gave a statement under section 183 stating that the relationship was consensual and she did not support the prosecution. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated and had no prior criminal record. The court considered the FIR allegations, the daughter’s statement, and the petitioner’s prolonged custody since December 2025. Finding the prosecution’s case weakened by the victim’s statement, the court ordered that the petitioner be released on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused under sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita in a child‑marriage case.
  • Whether the statement of the alleged minor under section 183 of the B.N.S.S. negates the prosecution’s case.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • child marriage
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • section 137
  • section 140
  • section 183
  • minor
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18786 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-385 Year-2025 Thana- ASHTHAWAN District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
                 Manish Paswan @ Manish Kumar Son of Shri Ramphal Paswan Resident of
                 Village -Deshna PS- Asthawan District- Nalanda
                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     Chameli Devi, wife of Sunil Ravidas Resident of Village - Deshna, P.S. -
                  Asthawan, Nalanda
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP
                                                 Mr. Bindeswari Singh, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   07-05-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Asthawan P.S. Case

                   no.385 of 2025 registered under sections 137(2) and 140(3) of

                   the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states

                   that his 15 year old minor daughter was taken away by the

                   petitioner for the purpose of marriage.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. It is a case of

                   love affair between the parties. The daughter of the informant

                   returned and her statement was recorded under section 183 of

                   the B.N.S.S wherein she has not supported the prosecution case.
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18786 of 2026(3) dt.07-05-2026
                                                         2/2




                       She has categorically stated therein that she was in love with the

                       petitioner and it was she who called him, both of them went

                       away and married. On learning about the lodging of the instant

                       case, they returned. The petitioner is in custody since 6.12.2025

                       and has no criminal antecedent.

                                    5. Heard learned A.P.P for the State and learned

                       counsel for the informant.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the material

                       that has transpired in course of investigation especially the

                       statement of the daughter of the informant recorded under

                       section 183 of the B.N.S.S wherein she does not support the

                       prosecution case together with the petitioner having remained in

                       custody since 6.12.2025, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged

                       on bail in connection with Asthawan P.S. Case no.385 of 2025

                       on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

                       with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                       the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII-cum-Special Judge

                       (POCSO), Nalanda at Biharsharif.



                                                   (Partha Sarthy, J)
Shiv/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.