Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ranjeet Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar Gupta, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. His counsel subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned judge considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner’s arrest

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1881 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-518 Year-2025 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur
                  ======================================================
                  Ranjeet Kumar Gupta Son of Rajnarayan Gupta Resident of Village-
                  Dharhara Badhotpur, P.S.- Ara Nagar, District- Bhojpur

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Akash Kumar Mishra
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Md. Matloob Rab, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    22-01-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the instant anticipatory bail

                    application.

                              3.    Permission is accorded.

                              4.    Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.