Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ganesh Yadav @ Gomesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The petitioners, Ganesh Yadav and Praveen Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case arising from an alleged assault on an informant and her son, with offences listed under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with co‑accused, assaulted the victims, causing head injuries. The petitioners contended they were falsely implicated due to an admitted land dispute, asserting the injuries were simple and they were innocent. The court considered the existence of a land dispute and the co‑sharer relationship between the parties, and applied Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Accordingly, the court granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioners to furnish bail bonds and sureties within four weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners despite the serious nature of the alleged offences
  • Whether Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, permits the grant of anticipatory bail in this context
  • Whether the admitted land dispute and co‑sharer status affect the assessment of culpability

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • land dispute
  • assault
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18926 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2025 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ganesh Yadav @ Gomesh Yadav S/O Thanu Yadav @ Thaman Yadav R/O
                  Village- Dhanawan, P.S- Barachatti, Distt.- Gaya.
           2.    Praveen Yadav @ Praveen Kumar S/O Thanu Yadav @ Thaman Yadav R/O
                 Village- Dhanawan, P.S- Barachatti, Distt.- Gaya.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Vijay Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-04-2026         1.   Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned

                            Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                       2.   This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out

                            of Barachatti Police Station Case No. 280 of 2025, dated

                            08.08.2025,       disclosing     offences       punishable         under

                            Sections      126(2)/115/117/109/352/351(2)/3(5)              of       the

                            Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                       3.   The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report,

                            is that the petitioners, along with other co-accused

                            persons, variously armed, came to assault the informant

                            and when the informant raised alarm, her son, Brahmdeo

                            Yadav, came there, upon which the petitioner no. 1
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18926 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                            2/3




                   assaulted him by tangi on his head, causing head injury

                   and the petitioner no. 2 assaulted the informant on her

                   head. Other co-accused persons assaulted other family

                   members of the informant.

              4.   Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                   petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated

                   in this case due to admitted land dispute. Both the parties

                   are co-sharers. The injuries sustained by the victims are

                   simple in nature.

              5.   Regards being had to the submissions advanced on behalf

                   of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that

                   there is admitted land dispute between the parties and

                   both the parties are co-sharers, I am inclined to grant the

                   petitioners privilege of anticipatory bail.

              6. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

              7.   Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their

                   arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period

                   of four weeks from today, be released on bail on

                   furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each

                   with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                   satisfaction     of    learned     Additional   Chief   Judicial

                   Magistrate-II, Sherghati, Gaya, in connection with
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18926 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                              Barachatti Police Station Case No. 280 of 2025, subject to

                              the condition laid down under Section 482 (2) of the

                              Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.



                                                                           (Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)
Prabhakar Anand/-

U √     T   √


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.