Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ranjan Kumar @ Mithu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, had filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. He then approached the court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the petitioner's request to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18957 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2025 Thana- Badem P.S. District- Aurangabad
                  ======================================================
                  Ranjan Kumar @ Mithu Singh S/o Late Dilip Singh Resident of Village-
                  Badem, P.S.- Badem, District- Aurangabad

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Ms. Mukul Kumari, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    08-05-2026                     1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                    2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                    that petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                    application was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the

                    same.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                    4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.