Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Sufel Sah @ Md. SufailversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Md. Sufel Sah and Suresh Ram, were arrested on 25 November 2025 after police recovered 216 litres of liquor from a pick‑up van and alleged they were involved in offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioners contended that they were not in possession of the liquor, that a friend of the first petitioner was using the vehicle, and that no incriminating material was found on them; they also highlighted their clean criminal record and the lack of compliance with Section 103 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (Suppression) Act, 2023. The State opposed bail. Considering the facts, the clean antecedent of the accused and the period of custody already served, the Court inclined to grant bail. The petitioners were ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.15,000 each with two sureties of the same amount. The order was pronounced by Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act offences.
  • Whether the non‑compliance of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 precludes bail.

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • liquor seizure
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 103 B.N.S.S. 2023
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-957 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Kishanganj
                 ======================================================
           1.     Md. Sufel Sah @ Md. Sufail S/o Late Md. Hanif Sah Resident of Village-
                  Majhauli, Ward No.9, P.S.- Belsar O.P., District- Vaishali
           2.    Suresh Ram S/o Harendra Ram Resident of Village- Majhauli, Ward No.9,
                 P.S.- Belsar O.P., District- Vaishali

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr.Ranjit Kumar Thakur, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Ms.Meena Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned APP for the State.

                               2. The petitioners seek bail in Special Case No.

                   975/2025, arising out of Excise P.S. case No. 957 of 2025

                   instituted for the offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of

                   the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                               3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 216 liters

                   liquor was recovered from pick-up van and the petitioners

                   were arrested on spot.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                            2/3




          implicated in the present case. No incriminating material

          has been recovered from the conscious possession of the

          petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the

          alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the

          petitioners submits that friend of petitioner No. 1 has taken

          the car for personal use and without checking the vehicle,

          the petitioner No. 1, who is owner of the car and petitioner

          No. 2, sitting as passenger when the police recovered the

          liquor. The petitioners have no concerned with the said

          liquor. I     The petitioners are in custody since 25.11.2025

          and have got no criminal antecedent. There is no

          compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S., 2023.

                      5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

                       6.     Considering          the      aforesaid   facts   and

          circumstances of the case, clean antecedent and the period

          of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is

          inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

                       7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand)

          each with two sureties of the like amount each to the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection

                     with Special Case No. 975/2025, arising out of Excise P.S.

                     case No. 957 of 2025.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Pankaj/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.