Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ramesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Ramesh Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The court considered whether a pending anticipatory bail application could be withdrawn post‑arrest. The judge granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Can an anticipatory bail application be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested?

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19188 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-450 Year-2024 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Ramesh Kumar S/o Raja Pandit Resident of Village- Banjaria, P.S.-
                 Madhuban, District- East Champaran
                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Jitendra Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Raj Kishor Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-03-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                   to withdraw the anticipatory bail application as the petitioner

                   was arrested during pendency of the same.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                   dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.