Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ramesh Sahni @ Ramesh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Ramesh Sahni, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Hon'ble Justice Satyavrat Verma granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1929 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2025 Thana- WARISNAGAR District- Samastipur
                  ======================================================
                  Ramesh Sahni @ Ramesh Sahani S/o Mahendra Sahni R/o Village- Chaundli
                  (Chaundauli), P.S- Warisnagar, Dist- Samastipur.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shashank Shekhar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    21-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.