Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Amit PatelversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Amit Patel applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 465 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 111, 61(2), 317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, the Arms Act and the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that police intelligence linked Patel to a planned offence and that he was named by co‑accused. Patel contended he was innocent, had been falsely implicated, and suffered a leg fracture with a surgical rod, rendering him unable to flee. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges and Patel’s prior criminal record. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted anticipatory bail subject to surrender within four weeks, a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, and compliance with Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under the circumstances of the case
  • Whether the petitioner’s medical condition and lack of incriminating material justify bail
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents preclude the grant of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • medical condition
  • framing of accused
  • bail conditions
  • Arms Act
  • NDPS Act
  • prior criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19327 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-465 Year-2025 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Amit Patel S/o Rajvanshi Patel @ Rajvanshi Singh Resident of Village -
                 Dewariya, P.S- Maharajganj, District - Siwan
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Kumari Anupam
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been

                   filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with

                   Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 465 of 2025 instituted for the offence

                   under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 111, 61(2), 317(5) of the B.N.S.,

                   2023 and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Sections

                   8/20 (b)(ii) B of the N.D.P.S. Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the police

                   had an input that certain persons have gathered for committing

                   some offence. Four persons were apprehended, and they disclosed

                   the name of the petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

                   offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. He also
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19327 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                    submits that the petitioner was not apprehended. Nothing has been

                    recovered from his possession. He has been framed in this case

                    only on the basis of his criminal antecedents. Petitioner is having

                    criminal antecedent of five cases. Learned counsel for the

                    petitioner further submits that a supplementary affidavit has been

                    filed, which goes to show that the petitioner has suffered a fracture

                    in his leg and is unable to move, with a rod having been surgically

                    fixed in his leg.

                                 5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has

                    opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

                                 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in

                    the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court

                    is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is

                    directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four

                    weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in

                    connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 465 of 2025, he will

                    be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

                    (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

                    the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-II, Siwan subject to the

                    conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.


                                                   (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.