Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Himanshu Kashyap @ Deeplal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Himanshu Kashyap, was arrested on 2 January 2026 in connection with FIR No. 714 of 2025 alleging that the son of an informant committed suicide due to harassment by the petitioner. The FIR, registered under Section 108 of the B.N.S., 2023, cited a suicide note blaming the petitioner. The petitioner pleaded clean antecedents and claimed the allegations were fabricated, seeking bail. The State opposed the bail application. The High Court, after considering the clean antecedent and the nature of the offence, granted bail on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, imposing conditions regarding trial cooperation, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of criminal antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 108 of the B.N.S., 2023 given the allegations of harassment leading to suicide.
  • Whether the clean antecedent of the petitioner warrants bail despite the seriousness of the accusation.
  • Whether the conditions imposed are sufficient to safeguard the trial process.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Section 108
  • suicide note
  • false implication
  • clean antecedent
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19508 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-714 Year-2025 Thana- RAJENDRA NAGAR (T) RAIL P.S.
                                                      District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Himanshu Kashyap @ Deeplal Kumar Son of Kirani Sah Resident Of Village-
                 Ward No 4, Kadhaan, Huseni, P.s. -Keshariya, District -East Champaran

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Advocate
                 For the State          :        Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   31-03-2026                      Heard Mr. Nafisuzzoha, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Harendra Prasad, learned APP for the State.

                                 2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   02.01.2026, in connection with Rajendra Nagar Patna GRP P.S.

                   Case No. 714 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 07.10.2025 registered for

                   the offences punishable under Section 108 of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                 3. Allegation against the petitioner is that the son of

                   the informant has committed suicide due to harassment of the

                   petitioner.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely

                   implicated in the present case.             He further submits that the

                   allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19508 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R.

          As per allegation in the F.I.R. against the petitioner that due to

          harassment of the petitioner, the son of the informant has

          committed suicide and it has come during investigation that the

          suicide notes were found from the pocket of the deceased in

          which it has been stated that he has committed suicide due to

          harassment and torture of the petitioner and the petitioner is in

          custody since 02.01.2026.

                        5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

          State has vehemently opposed the prayer for               bail of the

          petitioner.

                        6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

          and the fact that the petitioner having clean antecedent and the

          case is under Section 108 of B.N.S., 2023, let the petitioner,

          above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial

          Magistrate, Patna in connection with Rajendra Nagar Patna GRP

          P.S. Case No. 714 of 2025, subject to the following conditions :-

                        (1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19508 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026
                                                           3/3




                         on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                         reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                      (2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                         witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                         for cancellation of bail.

                                      (3) And, further condition that the court below shall

                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                         any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                         criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.             However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                                       (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.