Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dadan Ram @ Dadan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the stipulated conditions.

Summary

Dadan Ram, a headmaster, was accused of defalcating admission and registration fees of 116 students, allegedly preventing them from appearing for examinations. He contended that the fees were deposited with the Bihar School Examination Board, that the registration portal was not operational, and that he had no criminal antecedent, having already been suspended. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Sections 316 and 318 of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. The court noted the petitioner’s suspension, the deposit of the monies, and the absence of prior criminal record, and applied the provisions of Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 482(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. Accordingly, the court granted anticipatory bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of family surety, cooperation with investigation, and possible cancellation for non‑cooperation.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case of alleged defalcation under Sections 316 and 318 of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act.
  • Whether the petitioner’s suspension and the deposit of the alleged amounts affect the grant of bail.
  • What conditions may be imposed under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act in granting anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • defalcation
  • admission fee
  • school administration
  • Section 316
  • Section 318
  • bail conditions
  • suspension

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19597 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2026 Thana- KARAMCHAT District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
                 ======================================================
                 Dadan Ram @ Dadan Paswan Son of Gena Ram Resident of Village- Thiloi,
                 P.S.- Karamchat, District- Kaimur at Bhabhua
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                               ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Mukesh Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 316, 318 of

                   the B.N.S.

                                3. The petitioner, who was the then Headmaster of the

                   Upgraded Higher Secondary School, Sabar, is said to have

                   defalcated the admission fee and registration fee of 36 students

                   of science and 80 students of Arts.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits, at the

                   outset that the petitioner is the principal of the Upgraded Higher

                   Secondary School, Sabar and the allegation against him is that

                   he had taken admission fee and registration fee from students

                   but due to his conduct the students could not take their

                   examination. It is further submitted that the petitioner is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19597 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026
                                            2/3




          nowhere responsible for the offence as alleged. As a matter of

          fact, he had sent several mails to the Bihar School Examination

          Board, however, the registration process was not complete as

          the portal was not open. He has also submitted that the entire

          money has already been deposited before the Bihar School

          Examination Board (Annexure-5) and as such, the petitioner has

          not cheated any students and he has no criminal antecedent.

          Further, the petitioner has also been suspended.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the

          application for anticipatory bail.

                           6. Taking into consideration the facts and

          circumstances and also considering the fact that the petitioner

          has already been suspended and has deposited the amounts

          before the Bihar School Examination Board and in the

          development fund, let the above named petitioner in the event of

          his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

          learned court below where the case is pending/successor court

          in connection with Karamchat P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026, subject

          to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19597 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026
                                                         3/3




                       Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S., subject to the conditions that:

                                        (I) One of the bailors would be the family member

                       or relative.

                                        (II)     The      petitioner        shall   cooperate    in

                       investigation/trial      and     in     case   of    non-cooperation,    the

                       prosecution would be at liberty to move an application for

                       cancelling the bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                 (Soni Shrivastava, J)
devendra/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.