Patna High Court
Bajrangi YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
Anticipatory bail is refused.
Summary
Bajrangi Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest for alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that he, in collusion with other accused, abducted and assaulted an informant over a monetary dispute, intended to dump him in a forest, and a liquor bottle was recovered during the investigation. The petitioner also has a prior criminal antecedent. The court examined the seriousness of the accusations, the material recovered, and the antecedent. Considering these factors, the court refused the prayer for anticipatory bail, thereby dismissing the petition.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner given the nature of the alleged offences and his criminal antecedent
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 112, 115(1), 140(3), 142, 304, 3(5), 351(1)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- criminal antecedent
- abduction
- assault
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19638 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2025 Thana- MALAYPUR District- Jamui
======================================================
Bajrangi Yadav S/o Nageshwar Yadav @ Ajablal Yadav R/o Village - Jhinoura
Itahari, P.S - Tetarhat, District - Lakhisarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 07-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 140(3),
142, 112, 115(1), 351(1), 304, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita and Sections 30(a) and 37 of Bihar Prohibition and
Excise Act.
3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner in collusion
with other F.I.R. named accused persons abducted informant
and assaulted him due to monetary dispute. During
investigation, it has come that informant was forcibly taken by
the accused persons in a vehicle and was made captive in a
room. The accused persons were transporting the victim to
forest area with intention to dump him. During vehicle
checking, one liquor bottle was also recovered. Petitioner has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19638 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026
2/2
got one criminal antecedent.
4. Considering the nature of accusation, recovery and
criminal antecedent, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner
is refused.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U T
Checking your session…