Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Satish Kumar @ Chhabila YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
REJECTED

Holding

The petitioner's bail application is denied as there are no fresh grounds to revisit the earlier order.

Summary

The petitioner, Satish Kumar, was charged in a 2022 case for murder under Section 302 IPC, criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC, and illegal possession of arms under Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have fired on an informant’s father resulting in death. He applied for bail before the Patna High Court, having previously been denied bail in a 2024 order. The petitioner argued for release, but the court found no fresh ground to revisit the earlier decision. The court reiterated that the earlier bail denial remains valid and that the petitioner’s circumstances have not changed. Consequently, the bail application was rejected. The order was delivered by Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the earlier denial and absence of fresh grounds.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • criminal conspiracy
  • arms act
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19920 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2022 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad
                 ======================================================
                 Satish Kumar @ Chhabila Yadav, aged about 33 years, Male, Son of Lali
                 Yadav, Resident of Village- (Missir Bigha) Mishra Bigha, Police Station-
                 Parasbigha, District- Jehanabad.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Uday Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP
              ======================================================
             CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
                                    ORAL ORDER

3   01-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Sessions Trial No. 672 of 2022 arising out of Parasbigha P.S.

                   Case No. 161 of 2022 instituted for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 302, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section

                   27 of the Arms Act.

                                3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with

                   other co-accused persons have fired on the informant’s father

                   due to which he died.

                                4. Earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner was

                   rejected by this Court passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34905 of 2024

                   vide order dated 15.07.2024 and there is no fresh ground to
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19920 of 2026(3) dt.01-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      reconsider the prayer for bail of this petitioner.

                                   5. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is

                      again rejected.


                                                                 (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

Anand Kr.

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.