Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chandeshwar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that the petitioner may withdraw the anticipatory bail application and accordingly dismissed the petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Chandeshwar Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the State opposed the withdrawal. The court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw the application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20069 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-570 Year-2025 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj
                  ======================================================
                  Chandeshwar Yadav S/o Pahwari Yadav @ Pahavari Chaudhari R/o Village-
                  Girdhar Poiya @ Nagad Poiya, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    31-03-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks

                    permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application

                    as petitioner, during pendency of the same, was arrested.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.