Patna High Court
Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear.
Summary
Petitioner Pradeep Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar. The petitioner failed to appear before the court despite repeated calls. The State was represented by Advocate Pradeep Narain Kumar, A.P.P. The court noted the absence of any petitioner representation and applied the principle that a petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.
Issues considered
- Whether a petition can be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear before the court
Subjects
- petition dismissal
- non-appearance
- criminal miscellaneous
- high court procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20083 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1212 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Gaya
======================================================
Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep Kumar S/o Bhuneshwar Yadav R/o Village -Bagai,
P.S.- Gurpa District -Gaya ji
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar- A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 31-03-2026 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on
repeated calls.
2. Learned A.P.P. for the State is present.
3. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U T
Checking your session…