Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manju Manjhi @ Manju ManhiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court denied bail, finding no new ground to revisit the earlier denial.

Summary

Manju Manjhi was charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in Nawada P.S. Case No. 1279 of 2024. The petitioner applied for regular bail for the second time after an earlier bail denial on 05.08.2025. The trial is at an advanced stage, with six of seven charge‑sheeted witnesses already examined and only one independent witness pending. The petitioner argued that he has been in judicial custody since 30‑10‑2024 and cited two prior criminal antecedents, seeking liberty to renew his bail plea. The State opposed the bail, and the court found no new ground to revisit the earlier decision, noting the ongoing trial. Consequently, the bail petition was rejected and the lower court was directed to expedite the trial within one month.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given the advanced stage of trial and material evidence against him.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • trial stage
  • judicial custody
  • pre‑trial detention

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20654 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1279 Year-2024 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Manju Manjhi @ Manju Manhi S/o Rupan Manjhi R/o Village- Shobhia, PS-
                 Nagar, Distt- Nawada


                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   15-05-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                           2.      The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Nawada P.S. Case No. 1279 of 2024, instituted for the offences

                   under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

                   2023.

                           3.      This is the second attempt of the petitioner for bail.

                   The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail

                   which was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated

                   05.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 28028 of 2025 taking into

                   consideration the enough material against the petitioner to

                   establish his complicity in the occurrence.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20654 of 2026(3) dt.15-05-2026
                                            2/3




                  4.      In compliance of the order dated 03.04.2026, a

          report dated 20.04.2026 with regard to the present stage of trial

          has been received. From perusal of the aforesaid report, it

          appears that charge has been framed against the petitioner on

          02.07.2025 and out of seven charge-sheeted witnesses, six

          witnesses have been examined in this case including doctor and

          I.O. It is further reported that only one independent charge-

          sheeted witness is yet to be examined.

                  5.      Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 30.10.2024

          without any rhymes or reason and has got two criminal

          antecedents. It is further submitted that the petitioner was

          granted liberty of six months to renew his prayer for bail before

          the learned Court below if the trial is not concluded within a

          period of six months.

                  6.      Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                  7.      There is no new ground to consider the bail petition

          of the petitioner. From the aforesaid report, it appears that the

          trial is going on and is at an advance stage.

                       8. In view of the above, the prayer for bail of the

          petitioner is again rejected with a direction to the court below to
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20654 of 2026(3) dt.15-05-2026
                                                         3/3




                       expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a

                       period of one month from today.



                                                                   (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Rajorshi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.