Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Satish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to payment of Rs.2,000 and compliance with detailed bail conditions.

Summary

Satish Kumar sought protection from arrest in a case (Muffasil P.S. Case No.13 of 2026) where the FIR alleged his involvement in stone‑pelting and assault under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that a group, including Surendra Ram, assaulted a constable and villagers retaliated with stone‑pelting, implicating the petitioner as a passer‑by. The petitioner denied any participation and offered to deposit Rs.2,000 in the Chief Minister’s Relief Fund as a condition for bail. The State opposed, noting the petitioner’s name appears in the FIR. The court, after considering the submissions, granted anticipatory bail subject to the payment of Rs.2,000 and a set of strict conditions including a bail bond, sureties, regular appearances before police and court, and non‑interference with witnesses. The order directs that the petitioner be released on bail if arrested within four weeks, subject to compliance with the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner, whose name appears in the FIR for alleged stone‑pelting, is entitled to anticipatory bail under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
  • Whether the court can condition the grant of anticipatory bail on the payment of a sum to the Chief Minister’s Relief Fund.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • stone pelting
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • FIR
  • bail conditions
  • relief fund
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20869 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2026 Thana- MUFFASIL District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
                 Satish Kumar S/O Suvendar Ram R/O Village- Nathuni Bigha, P.S- Mufassil,
                 Distt.- Aurangabad.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mrs. Anita Kumari, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-04-2026                          Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel

                   for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

                                 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 13 of 2026 registered

                   for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 109(1),

                   324(5), 132, 121(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

                   lodged on 09.01.2026 by the informant, Abhishek Kumar.

                                 3. As per the prosecution story, the Police on secret

                   information about the liquor reached the place where it is

                   alleged that some of them came outside in inebriated state and

                   Surendra Ram resorted to assault which injured Ajit Anand one

                   of the constable. As they tried to retreat on the direction of the

                   accused persons, the villagers resorted to stone pelting. This led

                   to the F.I.R.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20869 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                            2/4




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          neither he is assigned with Surendra Ram nor was in any way

          involved in the stone pelting. He being a passer by has been

          roped. Last submission is that without accepting the allegation

          or outcome of the petition the petitioner intends to pay

          Rs.2,000/- by Demand Draft issued by the local branch of the

          State Bank of India/any Nationalized Bank to the Chief

          Minister’s Relief Fund to be submitted at the time of execution

          of bail bond.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that his

          name has also come in the F.I.R..

                       6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also

          that the main role has been assigned to Surendra Ram and

          others, omnibus allegation of stone pelting is on this petitioner,

          in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the

          privilege of anticipatory bail subject to payment of Rs.2,000/-

          by Demand Draft issued by the local branch of State Bank of

          India/any Nationalized Bank to the Chief Minister’s Relief Fund

          to be submitted at the time of execution of bail bond.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of

          arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the

          receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20869 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                            3/4




          (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-

          cum-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Court No.1, Aurangabad,

          in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 13 of 2026 subject to

          the following conditions:-

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document (Aadhar Card/Voter Id/Driving License/Pan Card) to

          show his/her bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioner shall be appearing before the Police

          Station as and when required for cooperating in the

          investigation;

                       (iii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

          before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

          dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her

          bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                       (iv) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned

          police station every month for next six months to mark his

          attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted

          before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be at liberty

          to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds;

                       (v) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20869 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                                        4/4




                      promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                      failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                      cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                   (vi) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                      criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                      to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.