Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court held that the petitioners are entitled to pre‑arrest bail after depositing the compounding fee and any penalty, subject to the conditions prescribed.

Summary

The petitioners, Karu Yadav and Mukesh Kumar, were arrested in connection with an FIR alleging illegal sand mining and were charged under several sections of the Bihar National Security (BNS) Act and Section 15 of the Environment Protection Act. They applied for pre‑arrest bail, contending that the offences are compoundable under Section 56(2) of the Bihar Minerals (Concession, Prevention of Illegal Mining Transportation and Storage) Amendment Rules and offered to deposit the required compensation. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The Court directed the petitioners to pay the compounding fee and any penalty to the District Mining Officer, who must certify the compounding within three weeks. Upon receipt of the certificate, the petitioners were to be released on bail, subject to surrender before the District Court within two weeks and verification of any prior criminal antecedents. The bail application was consequently disposed of with conditional pre‑arrest bail granted.

Issues considered

  • Whether the offences alleged under the BNS Act and the Environment Protection Act are compoundable under Section 56(2) of the Bihar Minerals (Concession, Prevention of Illegal Mining Transportation and Storage) Amendment Rules.
  • Whether pre‑arrest bail can be granted pending the compounding of the offence and payment of the penalty.
  • What conditions, if any, should be imposed on the grant of pre‑arrest bail in this context.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • pre‑arrest bail
  • illegal mining
  • compounding of offence
  • environmental law
  • Bihar Minerals Rules
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14788 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-928 Year-2025 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Karu Yadav, son of Chando Yadav, Resident of Vill.- Musan Bigha, P.S. +
                 District- Nawada
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     Santosh Prakash Jha S/O Late Kaushal Jha R/O Vill and Post.- Maubaihat,
                  P.S.- Manigachhi, Dist.- Darbhanga. Presently Posted as Mining Inspector,
                  Nawada.
                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                                                        with
                            CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 20980 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-928 Year-2025 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Mukesh Kumar, Son of Ramdev Yadav, Resident of Musan Bigha, P.S and
                 Dist- Nawada
                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     Santosh Prakash Jha Late Kaushal Jha Resident of village and Po-
                  Maubaihat, Ps- Manigachhi, Dist- Darbhanga Presently Posted as Mining
                  Inspector, Nawada
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 14788 of 2026)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Rajesh Ranjan Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, A.P.P.
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 20980 of 2026)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Rajesh Ranjan Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER
3   08-07-2026                     Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioners and learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection

                   with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 928/2025 registered for the

                   offence(s) punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(3) 112(2)b,

                   316(2), 61(2), 317(4) of the BNS and Section 15 of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14788 of 2026(3) dt.08-07-2026
                                            2/3




          Environment Protection Act.

                       3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, five tractors

          were seized loaded with illegally extracted sand.

                       4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          petitioners submitted that offence is compoundable under

          Section 56(2) of the Bihar Minerals (Concession, Prevention of

          Illegal Mining Transportation and Storage) Amendment Rules

          and petitioners seek to deposit the amount of compensation in

          accordance with the provision of the said Section.

                       5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the

          prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

                       6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf

          of parties, as well as, the provision of Section 56(2) of the

          Bihar Minerals (Concession, Prevention of Illegal Mining

          Transportation and Storage) Amendment Rules, the petitioners

          are directed to submit the compounding fee, as well as, the

          amount of penalty, if any, before the District Mining Officer

          concerned. The District Mining Officer, after being satisfied, is

          directed to issue certificate to the extent that the offence has

          been compounded after the petitioners have deposited the

          required amount of penalty. The above exercise is required to be

          carried out within a period of three weeks from the date of
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14788 of 2026(3) dt.08-07-2026
                                                          3/3




                        passing of the this order. The District Mining Officer or

                        competent authority-cum-District Magistrate must not delay to

                        act upon on or before the expiry of three weeks and

                        communicate the same to the learned District Court within the

                        said period. During the time taken in process, no coercive

                        action is required against the petitioners.

                                     7. Thereafter,       the     petitioners, above named, are

                        directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, on such terms and

                        conditions, as the learned District Court deems it fit and proper,

                        provided they surrender before the learned District Court

                        within a further period of two weeks thereafter or the

                        interim protection granted to them shall lose its force.

                                     8. The learned District Court is directed to verify

                        the criminal antecedent of the petitioners as stated in

                        paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is

                        pending against the petitioners as what has been stated in

                        paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically.

                                     9. The bail application stands disposed of.



                                                  (Purnendu Singh, J)
Niraj/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.