Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Aouranjaib MansooriversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail is granted to the petitioner subject to a bond and sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Aouranjaib Mansoori, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault by 16 named and 200 unknown persons and has been in custody since 27 November 2025. He sought bail, contending that he is not named in the FIR and that the post‑mortem report shows only two external injuries, which contradicts the prosecution’s claim of a large‑scale assault. The court examined these contentions and found merit in the petitioner’s claim that the evidence does not substantiate the charges against him. Consequently, the court granted bail, ordering the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount and to cooperate with the trial. The order is limited to the bail application and does not prejudice the petitioner’s case at any later stage of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given that he is not named in the FIR and the medical evidence does not support the prosecution’s allegation of a mass assault.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • FIR
  • post‑mortem report
  • evidence
  • trial cooperation

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21117 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2025 Thana- SANHAULA District- Bhagalpur

                 ======================================================
                 Md. Aouranjaib Mansoori S/o Late Mustafa Mansoori @ Late Mustaf
                 Mansoor @ Late Mustafa Mansur R/o Village - Disarath, P.S - Sanhaula,
                 District - Bhagalpur


                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr. Hansraj, Advocate
                                                 Mr.Md. Najmul Hodda, Advocate
                 For the State           :       Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                    ORAL ORDER


2   02-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                  2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Sanhaula P.S. Case No. 165 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109, 61(2),

                   126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(3) and 103(1) of the Bharatiya

                   Nyaya Sanhita.

                                  3. As per the prosecution case, 16 named persons and

                   200 unknown persons are said to have assaulted the deceased
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21117 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026
                                            2/3




          with various weapons.

                       4. The petitioner is in custody since 27.11.2025.

                       5. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the

          petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the

          postmortem report falsifies the prosecution case as only two

          external injuries have been found on the body of the deceased.

          He submits that if more than 200 persons would have assaulted

          the victim, the victim would have sustained large number of

          injuries.

                       6. Considering the fact that the petitioner was not

          named in the FIR and the fact that the medical report does not

          appear to support the case of the prosecution, this application is

          allowed.

                       7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail

          on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

          J.M.F.C., 1st Class, Bhagalpur/ concerned Court in connection

          with Sanhaula P.S. Case No. 165 of 2025, subject to the

          condition that the petitioner will co-operate in the trial.

                       8. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

          herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

          application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21117 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express

                     any opinion on the merits of the case.


                                                                      (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.