Sujal kumarversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21253 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-635 Year-2025 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka
                 ======================================================
                 Sujal Kumar Son of Amarnath Sah Kasera R/o Village - Amarpur, Ward no.
                 12, P.S. - Amarpur, District - Banka.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Anil Kumar, APP.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-04-2026                     Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner and learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection

                   with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 635 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Section 96 of the BNS and Section 4

                   of the POCSO Act.

                                3. Allegation is of kidnapping the minor daughter of

                   the informant on the pretext of marriage.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has

                   falsely been implicated in the case. The victim in her statement

                   recorded under Section 183 BNSS has not supported the

                   prosecution story. The petitioner is a student.

                                5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21253 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                            2/3




          the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

                       6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf

          of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in

          the F.I.R., at the time when the statement of the victim was

          recorded under Section 183 BNSS, her age was 17 years and 6

          months, she has not supported the prosecution case rather she

          has stated that she was in love relationship with the petitioner

          and as on date the petitioner and the victim are now adult, in

          absence of any allegation against the petitioner, the petitioner,

          above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of the learned District Court where the

          case is pending in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 635

          of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section

          438(2) Cr.P.C / 482(2) BNSS and further condition that the

          victim shall remain along with her parents till she attains the

          age of marriage.

                       7. The District Court is directed to verify the criminal

          antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner

          is involved in some other cases as what has been stated in Para-
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21253 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     3 of the bail petition, this order will automatically lose its force.

                                  8. The bail application stands disposed of.



                                                               (Purnendu Singh, J)
mantreshwar/-

U      T