Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Brajesh Kumar MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The bail petition was dismissed as there were no new grounds and the trial was at an advanced stage.

Summary

Brajesh Kumar Mehta was arrested in July 2024 and charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including murder, attempt to murder and offences against women. He applied for regular bail, having already been denied once by the Patna High Court. The State and the informant opposed the bail, arguing that the trial is at an advanced stage with all witnesses examined except the investigating officer. The court noted that no new ground was raised and, relying on precedent that bail is rarely granted once serious trials commence, rejected the bail petition. The court also directed the lower court to expedite the pending trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted to an accused at an advanced stage of trial for serious offences under the IPC.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • serious offences
  • trial stage
  • Indian Penal Code
  • high court
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21359 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-422 Year-2024 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Brajesh Kumar Mehta S/O Sri Rajaram Mehta R/O vill.- Rampur Basgara
                 ward no.- 3,P.O- Pachhiyari Jhirwa, P.S- Forbesganj, Dist.- Araria

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sitaram Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP
                 For the Informant        :       Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-04-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

                           2.      The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 422 of 2024, instituted for the

                   offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 302, 147, 148, 149,

                   354(B), 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

                           3.      This is the second attempt of the petitioner for bail.

                   The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail

                   which was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated

                   23.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3903 of 2025 taking into

                   consideration the nature and gravity of the offence.

                           4.      Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 18.07.2024
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21359 of 2026(2) dt.03-04-2026
                                            2/3




          without any rhymes or reason and has got no criminal

          antecedent.

                  5.      Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for

          the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of

          bail to the petitioner and submits that the petitioner is named in

          the FIR. Learned counsel for the informant also submits that the

          trial is in progress and all the witnesses have been examined in

          this case except I.O. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve the

          privilege of bail. Learned counsel for the informant relied upon

          a decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court reported in 2024 SCC

          OnLine SC 3539 (X. vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.), wherein

          in paragraph no. 14, the Hon’ble Apex Court has held as under:

                                  “14. Ordinarily in serious offences like rape,

                                  murder,      dacoity,        etc.,   once   the   trial

                                  commences and the prosecution starts

                                  examining its witnesses, the Court, be it the

                                  Trial Court or the High Court should be

                                  loath in entertaining the bail application of

                                  the accused.”

                  6.      There is no new ground to consider the bail petition

          of the petitioner. Considering the present stage of the case, it

          appears that the trial is going on and is at an advance stage.
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21359 of 2026(2) dt.03-04-2026
                                                         3/3




                                7.     In view of the above, the prayer for bail of the

                       petitioner is again rejected with a direction to the court below to

                       expedite the trial and conclude the same.



                                                                   (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Rajorshi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.