Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vivek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the stipulated conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Vivek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging outraging a woman's modesty under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 75, 79 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution’s informant, a major, initially lodged the complaint but later filed a compromise petition denying the allegations and claimed no injury or medical examination. The petitioner’s counsel argued innocence, highlighted the inordinate delay in filing the FIR, and emphasized his clean criminal record. The State and the informant’s counsel admitted the compromise and raised no objection to bail. Considering the nature of the allegation, the delay, the compromise, and the petitioner’s clean antecedent, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case involving alleged outraging of modesty under the B.N.S. and POCSO Act given the delay in FIR filing and the filing of a compromise petition.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • sexual offences
  • POCSO Act
  • delay in FIR
  • compromise petition
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 482
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21464 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2026 Thana- MALSALAMI District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Vivek Kumar S/o Ashok Ram Resident of Mohalla- East Nandgola, PS-
                 Malsalami, District- Patna.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar.
           2.    XXX D/o YYY R/o Vill - Purbi Nandgola, Arti Path, Bari Sangat, P.S-
                 Malsalami, Distt.- Patna

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Shashi Kant, Advocate.
                 For the State           :        Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, A.P.P.
                 For the O.P. No.2       :        Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   04-05-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP

                   for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

                                 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Malsalami P.S. Case No.03 of 2026 for the offences

                   registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 75, 79 of the B.N.S.,

                   2023 and Section 8/12 of POCSO Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has

                   alleged that the petitioner had outraged her modesty in public.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.

                   He further submits that there is inordinate delay in lodging the

                   F.I.R. without any plausible explanation causing the prosecution
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21464 of 2026(3) dt.04-05-2026
                                            2/3




          case doubtful. Learned counsel petitioner submits that the

          informant is major and due to some misunderstanding, she lodged

          the case against the petitioner, however, on realizing the same she

          filed compromise petition before the Court concerned wherein she

          had denied the allegation made in the F.I.R. He further submits

          that the informant has not received any injury and she was not

          medically examined. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is

          working as a labour, who has no criminal antecedent and he

          undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for

          the opposite party no.2 conceded the fact that the opposite party

          no.2 is major and she has filed the compromise petition before

          the Court concerned and they have no objection in granting the

          anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the

          nature of allegation leveled against the petitioner as well as his

          clean antecedent, in the event of arrest or surrender before the

          Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be

          released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

          (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to

          each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, POCSO,

          Patna in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No.03 of 2026,
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21464 of 2026(3) dt.04-05-2026
                                                          3/3




                        subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the

                        Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.