Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rohit Sharma @ Rohit Kr. SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Rohit Sharma filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, he surrendered to the authorities. He then sought permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail plea. The Court, after hearing counsel, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the applicant surrenders

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • surrender
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21533 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2024 Thana- Anandpur District- Banka
                 ======================================================
                 Rohit Sharma @ Rohit Kr. Sharma Son of Shankar Sharma Resident of
                 Village- Mohandih, P.S.- Anandpur, District- Banka
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Md. Nurul Hoda, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Binod Kumar, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has surrendered during pendency of the instant

                   anticipatory bail application, thus, seeks permission to withdraw

                   the same.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                   dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                                          (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.