Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ranjeet Sah @ Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that the anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn upon the petitioner’s request and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Ranjeet Sah applied for anticipatory bail. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2168 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2024 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran
                  ======================================================
                  Ranjeet Sah @ Ranjeet Kumar son of Sri Raj Kumar Gond @ Raj Kumar Sah
                  Resident Of Village- Ajayabganj Ps -Bhagwan Bazar District- Saran

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Bishwajeet Singh, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    27-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail application

                    was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                               4.    Accordingly,         the     instant     anticipatory           bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                           (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.