Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kailash RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court held that the anticipatory bail order may be corrected to reflect the accurate father’s name and the proper statutory sections, and the corrected order remains operative.

Summary

Kailash Rai was granted anticipatory bail on 22 December 2025 in Cr. Misc. No.89157 of 2025. He filed a petition alleging clerical mistakes: his father's name was recorded as "Ramanand Rai" instead of "Ramanand Rai @ Ram Nandan" and the sections of the FIR were incorrectly listed as "Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act" rather than the correct "Sections 272, 273, 308 of the IPC and Section 47(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act". The court examined whether such errors could be rectified without a fresh hearing. It ordered the correction of the father's name and the proper citation of the statutory provisions, and granted the petitioner four weeks to surrender before the concerned court. The earlier anticipatory bail order was thereby modified to reflect these corrections.

Issues considered

  • Whether a court may correct clerical errors in an anticipatory bail order without a fresh hearing
  • Whether the corrected order continues to confer anticipatory bail
  • Whether a time period for surrender can be granted in the modified order

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • correction of order
  • clerical error
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Indian Penal Code
  • surrender

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21755 of 2026
                                              In
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89157 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2013 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Kailash Rai S/o Ramanand Rai @ Ram Nandan, Resident of Village-
                 Sukumarpur, Dakshini Tola, PO- Rustampur, Dist.- Vaishali, Present R/o Kila
                 road, Patna City, P.S.- Chowk, Dist.- Patna

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sweety Sinha, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Shantanu Kumar, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. For the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide

                   order dated 22.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.89157 of 2025,

                   the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail but due to

                   inadvertence in the array of parties the father’s name of

                   petitioner has been mentioned as “Ramanand Rai” whereas the

                   father’s name of petitioner is “Ramanand Rai @ Ram Nandan”

                   and in paragraph no.2 of the said bail application, the Sections

                   in which F.I.R. was registered is mentioned as “Section 30(a) of

                   the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act” instead of “Sections 272,

                   273, 308 of the I.P.C. and Section 47(A) of the Bihar Prohibition
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21755 of 2026(2) dt.03-04-2026
                                                          2/2




                        and Excise Act”, therefore, the same may be corrected.

                                     3. In view of the submission made on behalf of

                        learned counsel for the petitioner, let the father’s name of

                        petitioner is directed to be corrected as “Ramanand Rai @ Ram

                        Nandan” instead of “Ramanand Rai” and in paragraph no.2 the

                        Sections in which F.I.R. was registered be corrected as

                        “Sections 272, 273, 308 of the I.P.C. and Section 47(A) of the

                        Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act” instead of “Section 30(a) of

                        the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act” in the order dated

                        22.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.89157 of 2025.

                                     4. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

                        further four weeks’ time from today is granted to the petitioner

                        to surrender before the Court concerned.

                                     5. Accordingly, the order dated 22.12.2025 passed in

                        Cr. Misc. No.89157 of 2025, stands modified to the above

                        extent.

                                     6. The order passed today shall be part and parcel of

                        the order dated 22.12.2025.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.