Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gopi Mahto@Gopi Chandra MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Gopi Mahto was arrested after police recovered 13.8 kg of ganja from his backpack in a case under Section 111(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and several provisions of the NDPS Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging procedural violations of Section 105 of the BNSS Act and that the seizure witnesses were police officers, and argued that the quantity, though above the ‘small’ limit, was far below a commercial amount and that he had no conscious possession or prior criminal record. The State opposed the bail. The court, noting the procedural lapses, the non‑commercial quantity, the petitioner’s clean record and the grant of bail to similarly situated co‑accused, ordered his release on regular bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted under the NDPS Act for a person alleged to possess a quantity of narcotic exceeding the small‑quantity threshold but below commercial quantity, considering alleged procedural lapses and lack of prior record.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • narcotics
  • quantity of contraband
  • procedural lapse
  • Section 105
  • conscious possession
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22006 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2025 Thana- HARPUR District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Gopi Mahto@Gopi Chandra Mahto, S/o Mahendra Mahto, Resident of
                 Village- Sagar Churaman, P.s.- Kesariya, District- East Champaran, Bihar

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Asha Devi, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Section 111(2) of

                   B.N.S. read with Sections 8, 23(c), 20 (b)(ii)(c), 25 and 29 of the

                   NDPS Act.

                                3.      The case of the prosecution is that from the

                   backpack of this petitioner, altogether 13.8 Kg. of ‘ganja’ was

                   recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

                   connection with the present case. It is further submitted that while

                   making seizure, police have not complied Section 105 of the

                   BNSS Act and the witnesses of the seizure list are police

                   personnel. It has also been submitted that the quantity of
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22006 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026
                                                         2/2




                       contraband, which has been recovered from the possession of this

                       petitioner, is though more than small quantity but much less than

                       commercial quantity. Nothing has been recovered from the

                       conscious possession of this petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is

                       languishing in judicial custody since 26.05.2025 having no

                       criminal antecedent. Learned counsel has further submitted that

                       similarly situated other co-accused persons have been granted bail

                       by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 84037 of 2025 and 10648 of

                       2026.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the

                       prayer of regular bail.

                                    6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

                       the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The

                       above named petitioner is            directed to be released on bail in

                       connection with Harpur P.S. Case No. 68 of 2025 on furnishing

                       bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the

                       like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special

                       Judge, Court No.II, under NDPS Act, East Champaran.


                                                        (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.