Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Jasim @ Jasim @ Jasim AkhtarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The Court held that bail could not be granted and dismissed the regular bail application.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Jasim, was arrested on 22 January 2026 in connection with an alleged stabbing incident that allegedly occurred on 19 May 2025 after a drug‑related altercation. He applied for regular bail, claiming a clean antecedent, that the injuries inflicted were minor, and that the parties had compromised. The State opposed bail, emphasizing that the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar National Security Act, 2023 are non‑compoundable and that the petitioner might abscond or tamper with evidence. The Court considered the seriousness of the charges, the non‑compoundable nature of the offences, and the risk of interference with the investigation. Consequently, the Court rejected the regular bail application.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted to the petitioner under the Bihar National Security Act, 2023 for the alleged offences.
  • Whether the offences alleged are compoundable or non‑compoundable.
  • Whether the alleged compromise between parties affects the bail decision.
  • Whether there is a risk of the petitioner absconding or tampering with evidence if released on bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • non‑compoundable offences
  • Bihar National Security Act
  • criminal procedure
  • abscondment risk
  • evidence tampering

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22014 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2025 Thana- KISHANGANJ District- Kishanganj
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Jasim @ Jasim @ Jasim Akhtar Son of Jalaluddin R/o Village -
                 Mahingaon, Gidhabasti Kasera, P.S. - Kishanganj in the district of
                 Kishanganj.
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                               ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-05-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1),

                   109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody

                   since 22.01.2026 and the informant alleges that he works as a

                   Guard in APHC Hospital and on 19.05.2025 at 08:30 PM, he

                   saw petitioner and Arman taking smack, on objection, Arman

                   caught him and petitioner stabbed him by knife causing injury

                   on neck, stomach and chest.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

                   informant. It is further submitted that even injuries suffered by
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22014 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      the injured have been opined to be simple in nature. It is next

                      submitted that parties have compromised.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes

                      the regular bail application of the petitioner and submits that

                      there is a specific allegation against the petitioner of stabbing

                      the informant causing injury on neck, stomach and chest. It is

                      also submitted that the offences for which the instant FIR was

                      instituted are not compoundable, but if the parties have

                      compromised that amply demonstrates the influence of the

                      petitioner. It is next submitted that if privilege of regular bail is

                      granted, the petitioner may abscond or try to tamper with the

                      evidence even.

                                   6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

                      APP for the State, the Court is not inclined to release the

                      petitioner on bail.

                                   7. Accordingly, the instant regular bail application

                      stands rejected.



                                                        (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.